Teo Jia Hui Veronica

Teo Jia Hui Veronica is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in receivership and evidence. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	16% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Marital Privilege	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Disclosure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Valuation Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Jia Hui Veronica has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Jia Hui Veronica has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Focus Law Asia LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Systematic Airconditioning v Ho Seng Ken: Marital Privilege & Evidence Act(Jan 2023) Standard Chartered Bank v Maersk Tankers: Misdelivery, Bills of Lading & Trade Finance(Sep 2022) Nishiki Holdings v Sankaty: Conflict of Interest, Loan Agreements & Valuation(Dec 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Jia Hui Veronica's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.1
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Jia Hui Veronica's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Systematic Airconditioning v Ho Seng Ken: Marital Privilege & Evidence Act 15 Jan 2023 Central Automotive Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	15 Jan 2023	Central Automotive Pte Ltd (Defendant): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal dismissed in part, as the court clarified the circumstances in which the Defendant Companies could rely on Section 133 of the Evidence Act to refuse to produce communications between Ho and Zheng.
2	Standard Chartered Bank v Maersk Tankers: Misdelivery, Bills of Lading & Trade Finance 26 Sep 2022 Maersk Tankers Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	26 Sep 2022	Maersk Tankers Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe defendant's appeal was allowed, and the orders made by the Assistant Registrar below were set aside.
3	Nishiki Holdings v Sankaty: Conflict of Interest, Loan Agreements & Valuation 19 Dec 2021 Nishiki International Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	19 Dec 2021	Nishiki International Investments Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appointment of HL China as Appraiser and the HL China Valuation Report is set asideAppointment of HL China as Appraiser and the HL China Valuation Report is set aside. The appointment of the Receivers is consequently invalid and void.