Teo Lu Jia

Teo Lu Jia is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 64.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated expertise across 39 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	10 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	8 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	8 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences Relating to Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Preventive detention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Persistent offenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maid Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Helper Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Primary School Admission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Precedents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Lu Jia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Lu Jia has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	14 cases	100% of cases	Ow Gan Wee v Public Prosecutor: Preventive Detention for Theft and Drug Possession(May 2023) Chiew Kok Chai v Public Prosecutor: EFMA False Declaration Sentencing(Jul 2019) Neo Ah Luan v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Dermal Filler Injections & Medical Registration Act Violation(Sep 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Lu Jia's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	21%
Won	92.1 parties avg	2.1	64%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	52.2 parties avg	2.2
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Lu Jia's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(14%)	14%
Partial	3(21%)	21%
Won	9(64%)	64%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2015	5 23	Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 3 cases (60.0%)
2017	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ow Gan Wee v Public Prosecutor: Preventive Detention for Theft and Drug Possession 10 May 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 May 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
2	Chiew Kok Chai v Public Prosecutor: EFMA False Declaration Sentencing 18 Jul 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed on the appellant.
3	Neo Ah Luan v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Dermal Filler Injections & Medical Registration Act Violation 02 Sep 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	02 Sep 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulAppeal partially successful; sentence reduced but conviction upheld (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Public Prosecutor v. Kusrini Bt Caslan Arja: Appeal on Sentencing for Child Ill-Treatment 25 Apr 2017 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	25 Apr 2017	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's imprisonment term was increased.
5	Dewi Sukowati v Public Prosecutor: Culpable Homicide Sentencing Appeal 22 Jan 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Jan 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the original sentence.
6	Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General: Scandalising the Court & Freedom of Speech 29 Nov 2015 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2015	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the Attorney-General. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Wong Yi Hao Henry v Public Prosecutor: False Information for Primary School Admission 27 Aug 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	27 Aug 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially LostThe Public Prosecutor initially sought a custodial sentence, but later did not oppose the appeal for a fine (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Loo Pei Xiang Alan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking - Appeal Against Sentence 19 Aug 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	19 Aug 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially unsuccessfulThe appeal was allowed in part, and the sentence on the trafficking charge was reduced.
9	PP v Khartik Jasudass: Trafficking Diamorphine - Common Intention & Knowledge of Drugs 02 Aug 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	02 Aug 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe Prosecution successfully convicted both accused persons on the charge of drug trafficking.
10	PP v Kho Jabing: Discretionary Death Penalty, Murder, Blatant Disregard for Human Life 13 Jan 2015 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	13 Jan 2015	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the death penalty was imposed on the Respondent.
11	Tan Kian Tiong v PP: Mobile Phone Use While Driving & Disqualification Order Appeal 30 Jul 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	30 Jul 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the disqualification order was dismissed.
12	Nandakishor v PP: Variance in Urine Tests & Misuse of Drugs Act Interpretation 25 Jun 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	25 Jun 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
13	Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court & Court of Appeal Jurisdiction 29 Apr 2014 Attorney-General (Applicant)Lost	29 Apr 2014	Attorney-General (Applicant): Application DismissedThe Attorney-General's application for leave to commence committal proceedings against Au Wai Pang was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Public Prosecutor v Kho Jabing: Re-sentencing for Murder under Penal Code s 300(c) 17 Nov 2013 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Lost	17 Nov 2013	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Appeal against re-sentencingThe prosecution urged the court to re-impose the death penalty on the convicted person, but the court re-sentenced the convicted person to life imprisonment and caning.