Teo Teresa Kirsten

Teo Teresa Kirsten is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in jurisdiction and international arbitration. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Teresa Kirsten has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Teresa Kirsten has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Teo Teresa Kirsten has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teo Teresa Kirsten has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Teresa Kirsten has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Teresa Kirsten has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Teresa Kirsten has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Teresa Kirsten has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Teresa Kirsten has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Teresa Kirsten has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Teresa Kirsten has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Teresa Kirsten has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Zoom Communications v Broadcast Solutions: Forum Non Conveniens & Submission to Jurisdiction(Aug 2014)
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	BQP v BQQ: Appeal Against Jurisdictional Ruling in SIAC Arbitration(Mar 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Teresa Kirsten's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Teresa Kirsten's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BQP v BQQ: Appeal Against Jurisdictional Ruling in SIAC Arbitration 13 Mar 2018 BQQ (Defendant, Claimant)Won	13 Mar 2018	BQQ (Defendant, Claimant): Tribunal's jurisdictional ruling upheldThe court upheld the tribunal's jurisdictional ruling in favor of the Defendant.
2	Zoom Communications v Broadcast Solutions: Forum Non Conveniens & Submission to Jurisdiction 19 Aug 2014 Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	19 Aug 2014	Broadcast Solutions Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; each party to bear its own costs.