Teo Wei Kiat Samuel

Teo Wei Kiat Samuel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in international commercial arbitration and arbitration. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and international commercial arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Production of documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Resignation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Wei Kiat Samuel has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	CZT v CZU: Appeal on Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Defence Equipment Defect(Sep 2024) CZT v CZU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Contract(Nov 2023) CZT v CZU: Production of Arbitral Tribunal Deliberation Records in Setting Aside Application(Jun 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Wei Kiat Samuel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	43.5 parties avg	3.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	33.8 parties avg	3.8
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Wei Kiat Samuel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CZT v CZU: Appeal on Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Defence Equipment Defect 12 Sep 2024 CZU (Respondent)Won	12 Sep 2024	CZU (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; CZT to pay costs to CZU. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CZT v CZU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Contract 26 Nov 2023 CZU (Defendant)Won	26 Nov 2023	CZU (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiff's application, effectively upholding the arbitral award in favor of the defendant.
3	CZT v CZU: Production of Arbitral Tribunal Deliberation Records in Setting Aside Application 27 Jun 2023 CZU (Defendant)Won	27 Jun 2023	CZU (Defendant): Successful DefenseDefendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's applications for production of the records of deliberations from the arbitral tribunal.
4	Mehta v Mehta: Director Resignation & Validity of Board Resolutions 14 May 2023 Quek Hung Guan (Respondent, Defendant)Won	14 May 2023	Quek Hung Guan (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of Mr. Quek Hung Guan. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.