Teo Wei Xian Kelvin

Teo Wei Xian Kelvin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in liquidated damages and res judicata. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in estoppel and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Estoppel	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Wei Xian Kelvin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Goldbell Engineering v Etiqa Insurance and Range Construction: Performance Bond Dispute and Abuse of Process(Jan 2022) Range Construction v Goldbell Engineering: SOPA & Set-Off for Liquidated Damages(Apr 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Wei Xian Kelvin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Wei Xian Kelvin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,800,000.00	1,900,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goldbell Engineering v Etiqa Insurance and Range Construction: Performance Bond Dispute and Abuse of Process 04 Jan 2022 Goldbell Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant)Won	04 Jan 2022	Goldbell Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; Etiqa is to make payment of the sum of $3.8m to Goldbell, with interest at the rate of 5.33% from the date of the filing of OS 335 until the date of this order (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Range Construction v Goldbell Engineering: SOPA & Set-Off for Liquidated Damages 08 Apr 2021 Goldbell Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	08 Apr 2021	Goldbell Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent.