Terence Teo

Terence Teo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in extension of time and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Terence Teo has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in damages and relief against forfeiture.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Damages	2 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Relief Against Forfeiture	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Share Forfeiture	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Terence Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Terence Teo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chee & Teo	2 cases	100% of cases	Nomura Regionalisation Venture Fund Ltd v Ethical Investments Ltd: Relief Against Forfeiture of Shares(May 2001) Nomura v Ethical Investments: Extension of Time for Appeal Service(Mar 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Terence Teo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Terence Teo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nomura Regionalisation Venture Fund Ltd v Ethical Investments Ltd: Relief Against Forfeiture of Shares 30 May 2001 Ethical Investments Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	30 May 2001	Ethical Investments Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowedThe appeal against the decision of the learned Assistant Registrar in dismissing their summons in chambers was allowed.
2	Nomura v Ethical Investments: Extension of Time for Appeal Service 12 Mar 2000 Ethical Investments Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Won	12 Mar 2000	Ethical Investments Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Application allowedApplication for an extension of time to serve the notice of appeal was allowed.