Thomas Tan

Thomas Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 23 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and shipping law. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 26% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Thomas Tan has demonstrated expertise across 158 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and admiralty and maritime law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	23 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 23 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	10 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	10 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dangerous Goods	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bailment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Demurrage	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sanctions Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Options to purchase	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Detinue	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Entire Agreement Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misdelivery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Frustration of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Repudiation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel by Convention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unfair Contract Terms Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intention of Parties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ostensible Authority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Actual Authority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Transaction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Incorporation of Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of condition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Requirements for waiver by election	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Communication of choice to affirm contract in clear and unequivocal terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Brokerage Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Novation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Variation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Privity of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts of indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sufficiency of consideration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel in defiance of statute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bars to rescission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Economic Loss	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indian Contract Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voyage charterparties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Variation of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Postal Rule	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ground for termination of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction of undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Effect of counterclaim	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Separability Doctrine	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Transactions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Licensing Regime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Design and build contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Caregiver Stress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Lien	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Soil Investigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ship Repair Services	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ship Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Piercing the corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Warn	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Delivery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ship-to-ship transfer operation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Marine Accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arrived ship	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lien	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance of breach of trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Traceable proceeds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Time charterparties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Time limitation of guarantor's liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cerebral Palsy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Thomas Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Thomas Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 18 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Haridass Ho & Partners	18 cases	78% of cases	Credit Suisse AG v Owner of Vessel “CHLOE V”: Security for Costs in Admiralty Claim(Sep 2022) Avra Commodities v China Coal Solution: Contract Formation & Intention(Dec 2019) ST Group Co Ltd v Sanum Investments: Enforcement of Arbitration Award & Scope of Arbitration Agreement(Nov 2019)
Haridass Ho and Partners	5 cases	22% of cases	Asta Rickmers v Hub Marine: Pre-Action Discovery for Arbitral Award Enforcement(Sep 2005) Icadam Technologies v CAD-IT: Defamation in Metal Stamping Software Industry(Jul 2005) Sunrise Crane: Duty of Care & Limitation of Liability in Dangerous Goods Transfer(Sep 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Thomas Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.4
Complex Cases: 6 (26%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	138.8 parties avg	8.8	57%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	9%
Won	93.6 parties avg	3.6	39%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	416.4 parties avg	16.4
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	33.8 parties avg	3.8
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Thomas Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	13(54%)	54%
Partial	2(8%)	8%
Won	9(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	917,928.35	101,992.049 cases	9
USD	615,034,085.78	205,011,361.933 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 23 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Credit Suisse AG v Owner of Vessel “CHLOE V”: Security for Costs in Admiralty Claim 27 Sep 2022 Owner of the Vessel “CHLOE V” (Defendant, Claimant in Counterclaim)Lost	27 Sep 2022	Owner of the Vessel “CHLOE V” (Defendant, Claimant in Counterclaim): Order to provide security for costsOrdered to provide security for costs in the amount of $265,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Avra Commodities v China Coal Solution: Contract Formation & Intention 23 Dec 2019 Avra Commodities Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	23 Dec 2019	Avra Commodities Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $1,465,850 (assumed USD, as the judgment specifies the amount in US dollars).
3	ST Group Co Ltd v Sanum Investments: Enforcement of Arbitration Award & Scope of Arbitration Agreement 17 Nov 2019 ST Vegas Co Ltd (Appellant)Won	17 Nov 2019	ST Vegas Co Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Leave Order granted to Sanum Investments Limited set aside.
4	Sanum Investments v ST Group: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Tribunal Jurisdiction 17 Jun 2018 ST Vegas Enterprise Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Jun 2018	ST Vegas Enterprise Ltd (Defendant): WonSummons allowed for S.T. Vegas Enterprise Ltd.
5	G-Fuel Pte Ltd v. Gulf Petrochem Pte Ltd: Dispute over Marine Fuel Oil Contract Formation 13 Apr 2016 Gulf Petrochem Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	13 Apr 2016	Gulf Petrochem Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; defendant ordered to pay $2,002,404.78 plus interest (assumed USD, as the judgment involves a transaction in US dollars).
6	PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa v Sindo Damai Shipping: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal 18 Aug 2015 Sindo Damai Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	18 Aug 2015	Sindo Damai Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Application dismissedThe Defendant's application for a stay of execution pending appeal was dismissed.
7	AQZ v ARA: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Jurisdiction & Expedited Procedure 12 Feb 2015 AQZ (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Feb 2015	AQZ (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed.
8	Resource Piling v Geospecs: Negligence in Soil Investigation & Economic Loss 04 Nov 2013 Geospecs Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	04 Nov 2013	Geospecs Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe defendant successfully defended the claim as it was found that they did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Azuma Engineering v MEP Systems: Option to Purchase & JTC Lease Extension Dispute 06 Apr 2011 MEP Systems Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	06 Apr 2011	MEP Systems Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed against MEP Systems Pte Ltd, with costs awarded to Azuma Engineering (S) Pte Ltd.
10	Kreuz Shipbuilding v The "Rainbow Star": Ship Repair, Negligence & Damages Assessment 16 Feb 2011 Kreuz Shipbuilding & Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	16 Feb 2011	Kreuz Shipbuilding & Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, with adjustments to the amounts awarded for steel work and mark-ups on non-standard items. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Crédit Agricole v The "Sahand": UN Sanctions, Admiralty Law & Vessel Arrest 30 Jan 2011 Fifteenth Ocean GmbH & Co KG (Defendant)Won	30 Jan 2011	Fifteenth Ocean GmbH & Co KG (Defendant): Release of VesselThe vessel "Tuchal" was released from arrest after the defendant made fund transfers to cover the plaintiff's claims. The amount of US$203,855,277 is based on the amount owing by the defendants, including interest projected to 14 December 2010.
12	Checkpoint Fluidic Systems v Marine Hub: Agency, Indemnity & Third-Party Liability 02 Jun 2009 Marine Hub Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	02 Jun 2009	Marine Hub Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent; appeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
13	Asta Rickmers v Hub Marine: Pre-Action Discovery for Arbitral Award Enforcement 27 Sep 2005 Asta Rickmers Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Cie KG (Plaintiff)Won	27 Sep 2005	Asta Rickmers Schiffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Cie KG (Plaintiff): Discovery GrantedPlaintiff was granted pre-action discovery and awarded costs of $2,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Icadam Technologies v CAD-IT: Defamation in Metal Stamping Software Industry 20 Jul 2005 Tan Chin Yeow Alvin (Defendant)Lost	20 Jul 2005	Tan Chin Yeow Alvin (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Sunrise Crane: Duty of Care & Limitation of Liability in Dangerous Goods Transfer 12 Sep 2004 Cipta Sarana Marine Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	12 Sep 2004	Cipta Sarana Marine Pte Ltd (Respondent): Claim allowedRespondent's claim in tort arising from the loss of a small steel tanker was allowed.
16	Intercontinental Specialty Fats Berhad v Bandung Shipping: Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence in Damages Assessment 01 Jan 2004 Intercontinental Specialty Fats Berhad (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Jan 2004	Intercontinental Specialty Fats Berhad (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal against refusal to admit certain evidence was dismissed.
17	Sunrise Crane v Pristine: Negligence Claim for Damage from Contaminated Nitric Acid 25 Nov 2003 Pristine (Plaintiff)Won	25 Nov 2003	Pristine (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff with costs and for damages to be assessed by the Registrar. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Feoso v Faith Maritime: Demurrage Lien on Cargo Without Bill of Lading Ownership 24 Aug 2003 Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	24 Aug 2003	Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to bear the costs of Faith. Security for costs, together with any accrued interest, were ordered to be released to Faith to account of its costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Bandung Shipping v Keppel Tatlee: Rights of Suit Under Bills of Lading Act 29 Oct 2002 Keppel Tatlee Bank Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	29 Oct 2002	Keppel Tatlee Bank Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe statement of claim was struck out, and the action was dismissed.
20	Faith Maritime v Feoso: Demurrage, Bills of Lading & Cargo Conversion Dispute 30 Sep 2002 Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	30 Sep 2002	Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claims DismissedFeoso’s claims against the Owner of the Vessel are dismissed.
21	Malaysian International Trading Corp v Interamerica Asia: Breach of Trust, Conspiracy to Defraud, Dishonest Assistance 29 Aug 2002 Flashy Properties Limited (Defendant)Lost	29 Aug 2002	Flashy Properties Limited (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Keppel Tatlee Bank v Bandung Shipping: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Contract of Carriage 08 Mar 2002 Keppel Tatlee Bank Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	08 Mar 2002	Keppel Tatlee Bank Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; certain parts of the statement of claim to be struck out instead. Costs of the appeal and the hearing below awarded to the Plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	AS Nordlandsbanken v Nederkoorn: Guarantee, Time Charterparty Breach & Damages Assessment 13 Dec 2000 Nederkoorn (Defendant)Lost	13 Dec 2000	Nederkoorn (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant for $650,928.35 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).