Timothy Lin

Timothy Lin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in prevention of corruption act and legal profession act. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Timothy Lin has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Reinstatement to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Timothy Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Timothy Lin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	75% of cases	PT Sandipala Arthaputra v STMicroelectronics: Clarification on Interest Calculation(Aug 2017) PT Sandipala v STMicroelectronics: Breach of Contract, Conspiracy, & Chip Supply Dispute(May 2017) Narindar Singh Kang v Law Society: Reinstatement to Roll After Corruption Conviction(Sep 2013)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	PT Sandipala v STMicroelectronics: Conspiracy, Directors' Liability & Contract Breach(Apr 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Timothy Lin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	26.5 parties avg	6.5	50%
Won	24.5 parties avg	4.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	27.0 parties avg	7.0
2018	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Timothy Lin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	5,861,529.12	5,861,529.121 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PT Sandipala v STMicroelectronics: Conspiracy, Directors' Liability & Contract Breach 05 Apr 2018 Oxel Systems Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	05 Apr 2018	Oxel Systems Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; unlawful means conspiracy claim against the Tannoses dismissed; Sandipala remains liable for breach of contract.
2	PT Sandipala Arthaputra v STMicroelectronics: Clarification on Interest Calculation 06 Aug 2017 Oxel Systems Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	06 Aug 2017	Oxel Systems Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Counterclaim AllowedOxel's counterclaim against Sandipala, Mr. Tannos, and Ms. Tannos was allowed. Damages awarded include US$5,406,378.72 for the price of chips, US$279,813.36 for down payment, US$15,960,654.65 for losses suffered, and US$175,336.44 for loss of profits. The monetary amount only includes the price of chips and down payment.
3	PT Sandipala v STMicroelectronics: Breach of Contract, Conspiracy, & Chip Supply Dispute 11 May 2017 Oxel Systems Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Partial	11 May 2017	Oxel Systems Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCounterclaim against Sandipala, Mr. Tannos, and Ms. Tannos allowed in part. Monetary amounts awarded. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Narindar Singh Kang v Law Society: Reinstatement to Roll After Corruption Conviction 29 Sep 2013 Narindar Singh Kang (Applicant)Won	29 Sep 2013	Narindar Singh Kang (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication for reinstatement to the Roll was allowed, subject to conditions imposed by the Law Society and additional conditions imposed by the court.