Toh Cher Han

Toh Cher Han is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in banking law and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Toh Cher Han has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Tort	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Cher Han has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Toh Cher Han has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	5 cases	83% of cases	UniCredit Bank AG v Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd: Letter of Credit Fraud & Misrepresentation(Oct 2022) Glenville v Quek Swee Chong: Validity of Writ of Summons Served After Expiry on Non-Working Day(Oct 2021) Goh Guan Sin v Yeo Tseng Tsai: Medical Negligence, Post-Surgery Care, Brain Tumour, Persistent Vegetative State(Nov 2019)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	17% of cases	UniCredit Bank v Glencore: Tort of Deceit & Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transaction(Nov 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Toh Cher Han's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Toh Cher Han's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	130,000.00	21,666.676 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	UniCredit Bank v Glencore: Tort of Deceit & Fraud Exception in Letter of Credit Transaction 27 Nov 2023 UniCredit Bank AG (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	27 Nov 2023	UniCredit Bank AG (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; UniCredit to pay costs of $100,000 to Glencore (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	UniCredit Bank AG v Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd: Letter of Credit Fraud & Misrepresentation 20 Oct 2022 UniCredit Bank AG (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Oct 2022	UniCredit Bank AG (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedAll claims against the defendant were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Glenville v Quek Swee Chong: Validity of Writ of Summons Served After Expiry on Non-Working Day 25 Oct 2021 ASC Clinic for Women Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Oct 2021	ASC Clinic for Women Pte Ltd (Defendant): Summons allowedSummons allowed and ordered to pay costs to the plaintiff of $5,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Goh Guan Sin v Yeo Tseng Tsai: Medical Negligence, Post-Surgery Care, Brain Tumour, Persistent Vegetative State 26 Nov 2019 Yeo Tseng Tsai (Defendant)Won	26 Nov 2019	Yeo Tseng Tsai (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed.
5	Singapore Medical Council v BXR: Appeal Against Costs Order in Medical Disciplinary Proceedings 03 Sep 2019 BXR (Respondent)Won	03 Sep 2019	BXR (Respondent): Costs Order UpheldThe Disciplinary Tribunal's decision to order costs against the SMC was upheld, and the respondent was awarded $20,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Tan Gek Young v Public Prosecutor: Illicit Sale of Codeine Cough Preparations 16 Aug 2017 Tan Gek Young (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	16 Aug 2017	Tan Gek Young (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against sentence dismissed in part; individual sentences varied, aggregate sentence remains. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.