Toh Shin Hao

Toh Shin Hao is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 88.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	8 cases	21% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 21% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	16% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Antitrust and Trade Regulation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abnormality of Mind	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Possession	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Shin Hao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Toh Shin Hao has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	5 cases	63% of cases	Azman bin Mohamed Sanwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking - Admissibility of Confession(Mar 2012) Pang Siew Fum v PP: Drug Trafficking - Knowledge of Diamorphine Possession(Feb 2011) Public Prosecutor v Nagaenthran: Importation of Diamorphine & Defence of Duress(Jan 2011)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	2 cases	25% of cases	Choi Byeongkuk v Public Prosecutor: Drug Possession - Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2011) Tan Chin Heng v Public Prosecutor: Theft Appeal Dismissed(Jan 2011)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	13% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Kok Weng Shang Bernard: Culpable Homicide and Mental Disorder Sentencing(Mar 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Toh Shin Hao's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Won	72.1 parties avg	2.1	88%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Toh Shin Hao's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Won	7(88%)	88%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Azman bin Mohamed Sanwan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking - Admissibility of Confession 05 Mar 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	05 Mar 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, overturning the conviction obtained by the Public Prosecutor.
2	Pang Siew Fum v PP: Drug Trafficking - Knowledge of Diamorphine Possession 21 Feb 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	21 Feb 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the convictions of Pang Siew Fum and Cheong Chun Yin.
3	Public Prosecutor v Nagaenthran: Importation of Diamorphine & Defence of Duress 18 Jan 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Jan 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the defendant.
4	Choi Byeongkuk v Public Prosecutor: Drug Possession - Misuse of Drugs Act 10 Jan 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Jan 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by Choi Byeongkuk was dismissed.
5	Tan Chin Heng v Public Prosecutor: Theft Appeal Dismissed 10 Jan 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Jan 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedSuccessfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
6	Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Abdullah: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Sep 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Sep 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was convicted and sentenced to death.
7	PP v Kwek Seow Hock: Drug Trafficking - Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumption of Trafficking 10 Sep 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 Sep 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Prosecution proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused had in his possession not less than 25.91grams of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking.
8	Public Prosecutor v Kok Weng Shang Bernard: Culpable Homicide and Mental Disorder Sentencing 31 Mar 2005 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	31 Mar 2005	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to imprisonment for life.