Toh Wei Yi

Toh Wei Yi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 33 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in international arbitration and collective sales. Their track record shows a 42.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 11 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated expertise across 92 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	22 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 22 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	8 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	8 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remission	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Open justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pre-action Interrogatories	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credit Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Supplemental Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Infra petita	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Academic Misconduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Purchase Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Wei Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Toh Wei Yi has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 23 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	23 cases	70% of cases	3D Infosystems v. Voon South Shiong: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Confidence & Conspiracy(Sep 2024) Re Lee Jun Ming Chester: Admission as Advocate and Solicitor Despite Past Offense(Oct 2023) CUG v CUH: Challenge to Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction on Contract Formation(Dec 2022)
Harry Elias Partnership	7 cases	21% of cases	Edwards v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group: Multi-Currency Loan Dispute(Mar 2012) Campomar SL v Nike International Ltd: Trade Mark Opposition Based on Earlier Trade Mark(May 2010) Sundercan Ltd v Salzman: Specific Performance & Contract Formation Dispute(Mar 2010)
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	2 cases	6% of cases	CES v IATA: Jurisdiction Challenge in International Arbitration(Mar 2020) BQP v BQQ: Appeal Against Jurisdictional Ruling in SIAC Arbitration(Mar 2018)
Legal21 LLC	1 cases	3% of cases	Tan Joy Hon v Sassoon Samuel: Collective Sale Agreement Validity & Authority Dispute(Nov 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Toh Wei Yi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.8
Complex Cases: 11 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	124.5 parties avg	4.5	36%
Neutral	34.0 parties avg	4.0	9%
Partial	44.5 parties avg	4.5	12%
Won	1412.0 parties avg	12.0	42%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	130.0 parties avg	30.0
2008	35.3 parties avg	5.3
2010	33.2 parties avg	3.2
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2015	35.9 parties avg	5.9
2016	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	63.5 parties avg	3.5
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Toh Wei Yi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	12(36%)	36%
Neutral	3(9%)	9%
Partial	4(12%)	12%
Won	14(42%)	42%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
AUD	2,964,795.63	2,964,795.631 cases	1
HKD	4,043,424.75	4,043,424.751 cases	1
SGD	19,452,047.81	1,023,791.9919 cases	19

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2010	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2015	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	6 411	Lost: 4 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 33 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	3D Infosystems v. Voon South Shiong: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Confidence & Conspiracy 15 Sep 2024 3D Infosystems Pte Ltd (formerly known as 3D Networks Singapore Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff)Won	15 Sep 2024	3D Infosystems Pte Ltd (formerly known as 3D Networks Singapore Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant solely in the amount of S$445,685.57 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Re Lee Jun Ming Chester: Admission as Advocate and Solicitor Despite Past Offense 08 Oct 2023 Chong Weng Teng (Applicant)Won	08 Oct 2023	Chong Weng Teng (Applicant): Application AllowedThe court was satisfied that Mr. Chong was a fit and proper person for admission to the bar.
3	CUG v CUH: Challenge to Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction on Contract Formation 01 Dec 2022 CUG (Applicant)Lost	01 Dec 2022	CUG (Applicant): Application DismissedThe application to challenge the tribunal's jurisdiction was dismissed.
4	Song Jianbo v Sunmax Global Capital Fund 1 Pte Ltd: Winding Up Order for Inability to Pay Debts 19 Sep 2022 Song Jianbo (Claimant)Won	19 Sep 2022	Song Jianbo (Claimant): Winding up order grantedWinding up order granted in favour of the claimant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
5	CKH v CKG: Appeal on Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction and Award Remission under UNCITRAL Model Law 29 Aug 2022 CKH (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	29 Aug 2022	CKH (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	3D Networks Singapore Pte Ltd v Voon South Shiong: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty, and Conspiracy 17 Jul 2022 3D Networks Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Jul 2022	3D Networks Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for Plaintiff in part; damages to be assessed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Xia Zheng v Song Jianbo: Effect of Divorce Judgment on Joint Tenancy & Writ of Seizure 25 May 2022 Song Jianbo (Defendant)Lost	25 May 2022	Song Jianbo (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication to maintain the writ of seizure and sale was dismissed, with costs awarded to the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	CKH v CKG: Appeal on Arbitration Award Remission Regarding Principal Debt and Interest 07 Apr 2022 CKH (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	07 Apr 2022	CKH (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; CKH ordered to pay CKG $50,000 for the costs of the appeal, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Song Jianbo v Sunmax Global Capital: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in GIP Investment 22 Sep 2021 Song Jianbo (Plaintiff)Won	22 Sep 2021	Song Jianbo (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,237,500 with interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	CKG v. CKH: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Failure to Consider Principal Debt 17 Jun 2021 CKH (Defendant, Claimant)Lost	17 Jun 2021	CKH (Defendant, Claimant): Application in relation to the Freight Interest Issue denied.The court denied the plaintiff's application to set aside that part of the Award which dealt with the Freight Interest Issue.
11	CES v IATA: Jurisdiction Challenge in International Arbitration 23 Mar 2020 International Air Transport Association (Respondent)Won	23 Mar 2020	International Air Transport Association (Respondent): Tribunal's Jurisdiction AffirmedThe court declared that the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the claims of IATA in the arbitration (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	BQP v BQQ: Appeal Against Jurisdictional Ruling in SIAC Arbitration 13 Mar 2018 BQQ (Defendant, Claimant)Won	13 Mar 2018	BQQ (Defendant, Claimant): Tribunal's jurisdictional ruling upheldThe court upheld the tribunal's jurisdictional ruling in favor of the Defendant.
13	Yuanta Asset Management v Telemedia Pacific: Security for Costs in Appeal 09 Feb 2017 Yeh Mao-Yuan (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	09 Feb 2017	Yeh Mao-Yuan (Appellant, Respondent): Additional security for costs orderedThe appellant was ordered to furnish an additional SGD 20,000 as security for costs, bringing the total to SGD 50,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Telemedia Pacific v Yuanta: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Conversion 06 Dec 2016 Yeh Mao-Yuan (Defendant)Lost	06 Dec 2016	Yeh Mao-Yuan (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantOrdered to pay damages for unauthorized sales of shares and shortfall of loan funds, plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Foo Jong Long Dennis v Ang Yee Lim Lawrence: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Conspiracy 27 Jan 2016 William Tan Leong Ko (Defendant)Won	27 Jan 2016	William Tan Leong Ko (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; all claims against him dismissed.
16	Lim Kok Wah v Lim Boh Yong: Minority Oppression & Control of Siem Seng Hing & Kenson 12 Aug 2015 LIM BENG TUAN (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Aug 2015	LIM BENG TUAN (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedMinority oppression claim dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Telemedia v Credit Agricole: Contractual Indemnity and Third-Party Costs 02 Jul 2015 Yeh Mao-Yuan (Third Party)Neutral	02 Jul 2015	Yeh Mao-Yuan (Third Party): Third Party Claim DismissedThird party claim against Mr. Yeh was dismissed; Credit Agricole to bear Mr. Yeh's costs on a standard basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Foo Jong Long Dennis v Ang Yee Lim: Implied Undertaking & Use of Disclosed Documents 28 Jan 2015 Another (Defendant)Lost	28 Jan 2015	Another (Defendant): Appeal against ruling on preliminary issueThe Defendants appealed against the court's ruling on the preliminary issue.
19	ANZ Bank v De Saram: Summary Judgment Appeal on Loan Agreements & Counterclaim 26 Nov 2014 Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	26 Nov 2014	Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Summary Judgment UpheldSummary judgment against the Borrower for HK$4,043,424.75 (Hong Kong Dollar).
20	Telemedia v Credit Agricole: Breach of Mandate & Duty of Care in Share Transfer Dispute 17 Nov 2014 Yeh Mao-Yuan (Third Party)Won	17 Nov 2014	Yeh Mao-Yuan (Third Party): Claim DismissedThe third-party claim against Yeh Mao-Yuan was dismissed.
21	Haywood Management Ltd v Eagle Aero Technology Pte Ltd: Pre-Action Discovery & Conspiracy/Fraud Claim 18 Aug 2014 Haywood Management Ltd (Applicant, Respondent)Partial	18 Aug 2014	Haywood Management Ltd (Applicant, Respondent): Application for pre-action discovery granted in partApplication for pre-action discovery granted in part; application for pre-action interrogatories not granted at this stage. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Marina Bay Sands v Ong Boon Lin: Enforceability of Casino Credit Agreement for Premium Player 25 Aug 2013 MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Won	25 Aug 2013	MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff on its claim for $240,868.00, default interest on the Principal Amount of $240,868.00 at the contractual rate of 12% per annum calculated from 15 August 2010 until the date of receipt of full payment by the Plaintiff; and costs to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Breach of Directors' Duties & Conspiracy 30 Oct 2012 William Tan (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	30 Oct 2012	William Tan (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal Allowed in PartWilliam Tan's claim of conspiracy against Margaret Tung and Lin Jian Wei was partially allowed.
24	Edwards v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group: Multi-Currency Loan Dispute 20 Mar 2012 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (Defendant)Won	20 Mar 2012	Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedThe defendant's counterclaim against the plaintiff was allowed for AUD 2,964,795.63.
25	Marina Bay Sands v Ong Boon Lin: Enforceability of Casino Debt & Premium Player Status 29 Mar 2011 MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Neutral	29 Mar 2011	MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Leave to defend granted upon conditionLeave to defend granted upon the condition that the defendant pay into court, or provide security by way of a banker’s guarantee, the full amount of the claim (ie the sum of $240,868.00 with interest on the said sum at the annual rate of 12% from 14 August 2010 until 25 March 2011 (without prejudice to the plaintiff’s claimed sums as stated in its pleadings)), by 26 April 2011, failing which the plaintiff would be at liberty to enter final judgment against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	Campomar SL v Nike International Ltd: Trade Mark Registration Dispute 27 Feb 2011 Nike International Ltd (Respondent)Lost	27 Feb 2011	Nike International Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedNike International's application for registration was rejected.
27	Campomar SL v Nike International Ltd: Trade Mark Opposition Based on Earlier Trade Mark 04 May 2010 Nike International Ltd (Respondent)Won	04 May 2010	Nike International Ltd (Respondent): Application allowedNike's application to register the trademark was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	Sundercan Ltd v Salzman: Specific Performance & Contract Formation Dispute 22 Mar 2010 Alain Mallart (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Mar 2010	Alain Mallart (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim for specific performance was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	Zage v Ho: Knowing Receipt, Breach of Trust, and Solicitor Misappropriation 09 Feb 2010 Kaori Kathleen Zage (Appellant)Partial	09 Feb 2010	Kaori Kathleen Zage (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; DeFred is liable to account to the appellants as trustee for the sum transferred in the Cash Cheque ie, $270,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30	Tan Siew Tian v Lee Khek Ern Ken: Collective Sale Application & Subsidiary Proprietor Definition under Land Titles (Strata) Act 23 Jun 2008 Ong Wen Hui (Appellant)Won	23 Jun 2008	Ong Wen Hui (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs here and below (both the High Court and STB proceedings) and with the usual consequential orders. The decisions of the High Court and the STB were set aside and the matter was remitted to the STB for further consideration. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	Tan Siew Tian v Lee Khek Ern Ken: Collective Sale Compliance Under Land Titles (Strata) Act 18 Mar 2008 Ong Wen Hui (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	18 Mar 2008	Ong Wen Hui (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe plaintiffs' appeal against the Strata Titles Board's dismissal of their application was dismissed.
32	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Striking Out Defence 26 Feb 2008 Ang Yee Lim Lawrence (Defendant)Neutral	26 Feb 2008	Ang Yee Lim Lawrence (Defendant): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party.
33	Tan Joy Hon v Sassoon Samuel: Collective Sale Agreement Validity & Authority Dispute 05 Nov 2007 Mah Kai Leong (Defendant)Won	05 Nov 2007	Mah Kai Leong (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe originating summons was dismissed, and the plaintiffs were ordered to pay indemnity costs to all nine defendants.