Tony Yeo Soo Mong

Tony Yeo Soo Mong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and costs. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and patents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	15% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Patents	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranty of Authority	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Claim Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patent Invalidity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patent Specification	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patent Revocation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inventions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tony Yeo Soo Mong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tony Yeo Soo Mong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	6 cases	100% of cases	IIa Technologies v Element Six: Patent Invalidity & Infringement in CVD Diamond Production(Feb 2023) COMPASS v Golden Village: Copyright Licence Termination & Misrepresentation(Jan 2021) Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute(Jul 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tony Yeo Soo Mong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	32.3 parties avg	2.3	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tony Yeo Soo Mong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	3(50%)	50%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	193,967.38	48,491.854 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	IIa Technologies v Element Six: Patent Invalidity & Infringement in CVD Diamond Production 16 Feb 2023 IIa Technologies Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Won	16 Feb 2023	IIa Technologies Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the High Court's decision was allowed, and the patent SG 872 was revoked.
2	COMPASS v Golden Village: Copyright Licence Termination & Misrepresentation 18 Jan 2021 Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd (formerly known as Golden Village (Yishun) Pte Ltd) (Defendant)Partial	18 Jan 2021	Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd (formerly known as Golden Village (Yishun) Pte Ltd) (Defendant): Counterclaim partially allowedGV succeeds only in obtaining a declaration that the Licence had been terminated such that 30 June 2017 was the last day on which the Licence was in force. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute 21 Jul 2020 IIa Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	21 Jul 2020	IIa Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim that SG 872 and SG 508 were invalid was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: CVD Diamond Patents, Validity, and Infringement 06 Feb 2020 IIa Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	06 Feb 2020	IIa Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant in partSG 508 found invalid and not infringed.
5	MFM Restaurants v Fish & Co: Breach of Contract & Damages Assessment 17 Oct 2010 Fish & Co Restaurants Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	17 Oct 2010	Fish & Co Restaurants Pte Ltd (Respondent): Damages AwardedDamages awarded in the amount of SGD 193,967.38 (comprising SGD 95,649.98 for damages to be awarded during the Breach Period and SGD 98,317.40 for damages to be awarded during the Post-Breach Period). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Low Tuck Kwong v Sia Sukamto: Defamation Claim & Amendment of Defence 23 Jun 2009 Low Tuck Kwong (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	23 Jun 2009	Low Tuck Kwong (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to grant leave to amend the Defence was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).