V Jesudevan

V Jesudevan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and company law. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

V Jesudevan has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Convertible Bonds	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Investment Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Force Majeure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Revisionary Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation Privilege	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Allotment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	V Jesudevan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

V Jesudevan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	40% of cases	Rahimah Bte Mohd Salim v Public Prosecutor: Litigation Privilege & Disclosure of IMH Reports(Oct 2016) SGB Starkstrom v Commissioner for Labour: Work Injury Compensation & Mental Capacity(Apr 2016)
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	Auston v Ng Swee Hua: Convertible Bonds, Share Allotment, and SGX-ST Listing Manual Compliance(Aug 2009) Holcim v Kwan Yong: Force Majeure & Economic Duress in Concrete Supply Contract(Dec 2008)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	20% of cases	Ng Swee Hua v Auston: Breach of Contract over Convertible Bonds & Share Conversion(Dec 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of V Jesudevan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	42.8 parties avg	2.8	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of V Jesudevan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	330,153.40	110,051.133 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rahimah Bte Mohd Salim v Public Prosecutor: Litigation Privilege & Disclosure of IMH Reports 10 Oct 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	10 Oct 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedCriminal revision allowed. Disclosure Order set aside; retrial ordered before a different district judge.
2	SGB Starkstrom v Commissioner for Labour: Work Injury Compensation & Mental Capacity 20 Apr 2016 THE COMMISSIONER FOR LABOUR (Respondent)Won	20 Apr 2016	THE COMMISSIONER FOR LABOUR (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Commissioner's decision was upheld. Costs of $25,000 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Auston v Ng Swee Hua: Convertible Bonds, Share Allotment, and SGX-ST Listing Manual Compliance 04 Aug 2009 Ng Swee Hua (Respondent)Won	04 Aug 2009	Ng Swee Hua (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment in favor of the respondent; damages to be assessed before the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ng Swee Hua v Auston: Breach of Contract over Convertible Bonds & Share Conversion 28 Dec 2008 Ng Swee Hua (Plaintiff)Won	28 Dec 2008	Ng Swee Hua (Plaintiff): Judgment on liability in favor of the plaintiffJudgment on liability in favor of the plaintiff. Damages for the loss of chance to convert to Auston shares be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Holcim v Kwan Yong: Force Majeure & Economic Duress in Concrete Supply Contract 10 Dec 2008 Holcim (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	10 Dec 2008	Holcim (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment awarded to the plaintiff for $305,153.40 with interest and costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.