Ng Swee Hua v Auston: Breach of Contract over Convertible Bonds & Share Conversion

In Ng Swee Hua v Auston International Group Ltd and Auston Institute of Management & Technology Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore ruled in favor of Ng Swee Hua, finding Auston International Group Ltd in breach of contract. The case concerned an investment agreement where Ng Swee Hua was to receive convertible bonds. The court held that Auston breached the agreement by failing to convene a shareholder's meeting to approve the conversion of the bonds into shares. The court ordered damages to be assessed for the loss of opportunity to convert the bonds.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Ng Swee Hua sued Auston for breach of contract regarding convertible bonds. The court found Auston liable for failing to convene a shareholder's meeting.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Ng Swee HuaPlaintiffIndividualJudgment on liability in favor of the plaintiffWonBoey Swee Siang, V Jesudevan
Auston International Group LtdDefendantCorporationBreach of Investment AgreementLostN Sreenivasan, Valerie Ang
Auston Institute of Management & Technology Pte LtdDefendantCorporationNo specific outcomeNeutralN Sreenivasan, Valerie Ang

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Belinda Ang Saw EanJYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Boey Swee SiangRajah & Tann
V JesudevanRajah & Tann
N SreenivasanStraits Law Practice LLC
Valerie AngStraits Law Practice LLC

4. Facts

  1. Auston was in financial difficulties and needed funding.
  2. Ng Swee Hua provided a loan of $200,000 to Auston.
  3. An Investment Agreement was signed for Ng Swee Hua to subscribe for convertible bonds.
  4. Ng Swee Hua was appointed Managing Director of AIMT and a director of Auston.
  5. Ng Swee Hua sent a Notice of Conversion to convert the bonds into shares.
  6. Auston failed to convene a shareholders' meeting to approve the conversion.
  7. Ng Swee Hua resigned from his directorships and instituted legal action.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Ng Swee Hua v Auston International Group Ltd, Suit 129/2007, [2008] SGHC 241

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Auston Institute of Management & Technology Pte Ltd incorporated
Investment Agreement signed
First tranche of convertible bonds issued
Ng Swee Hua became Managing Director of AIMT
Ng Swee Hua became a director of both defendants
Supplemental Investment Agreement signed
Ng Swee Hua appointed President and Chief Operating Officer of Auston
Ng Swee Hua resigned as Managing Director of AIMT and President and Chief Operating Officer of Auston
Ng Swee Hua sent Notice of Conversion
Reminder sent regarding Notice of Conversion
Ng Swee Hua resigned from all directorships in the defendants
Action instituted to enforce the terms of the Investment Agreement and Supplemental Investment Agreement
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court found that Auston breached the Investment Agreement by failing to call for a shareholders’ meeting to seek approval to issue the shares in Auston.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to issue convertible bonds
      • Failure to convene shareholders' meeting
      • Failure to convert bonds into shares
  2. Interpretation of Contractual Terms
    • Outcome: The court interpreted the Investment Agreement and Supplemental Investment Agreement to determine the obligations of the parties.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Condition precedent
      • Rescission
      • Typographical errors

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Specific Performance
  2. Damages
  3. Interest

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Education

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Aberfoyle Plantations Ltd v ChengN/AYes[1960] 1 AC 115N/ACited for the proposition that when a conditional contract of sale fixed a date for completion, then those conditions must be fulfilled by that date, failing which there is no binding obligation on either party to complete the sale.
Chi Liung Holdings Sdn Bhd v Attorney GeneralN/AYes[1994] 2 SLR 354SingaporeCited for the proposition that when a conditional contract of sale fixed a date for completion, then those conditions must be fulfilled by that date, failing which there is no binding obligation on either party to complete the sale.
Tan Cheow Gek v Gimly Holdings Pte LtdN/AYes[1992] 2 SLR 817SingaporeCited for the proposition that when a conditional contract of sale fixed a date for completion, then those conditions must be fulfilled by that date, failing which there is no binding obligation on either party to complete the sale.
East v Pantiles (Plant Hire) LtdN/AYes[1982] 2 EGLR 111N/ACited for the principle that a mistake in a written instrument could be corrected as a matter of construction if there is a clear mistake on the face of the instrument and it is clear what correction ought to be made in order to cure the mistake.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Rules 804 and 812 of the Listing Manual
Rule 805(2) of the Listing Manual
Rule 806 of the Listing Manual
Rule 866 of the Listing Manual

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Convertible Bonds
  • Investment Agreement
  • Supplemental Investment Agreement
  • Notice of Conversion
  • Shareholders' Approval
  • Listing Manual
  • General Mandate
  • Completion Date
  • Auston Conversion Shares

15.2 Keywords

  • Convertible Bonds
  • Breach of Contract
  • Share Conversion
  • Shareholders' Approval
  • Singapore High Court

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Corporate Finance
  • Securities Law

17. Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Investment Law
  • Corporate Law