V Kanyakumari

V Kanyakumari is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and matrimonial assets. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

V Kanyakumari has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and matrimonial assets.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	5 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	5 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Divorce	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Division of Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stock Options	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rules of Court 2021	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	V Kanyakumari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

V Kanyakumari has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sim Hill Tan & Wong	4 cases	80% of cases	Chan Teck Hock David v Leong Mei Chuan: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Stock Options & Child Custody(Jan 2002) Leong Mei Chuan v David Chan Teck Hock: Appeal on Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance(Apr 2001) Leong Mei Chuan v Chan Teck Hock David: Amendment of Notice of Appeal in Matrimonial Asset Division(Feb 2001)
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 cases	20% of cases	O'Connor v Potter: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute(Mar 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of V Kanyakumari's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of V Kanyakumari's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,000.00	3,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	O'Connor v Potter: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute 08 Mar 2011 Potter Derek John (Husband, Respondent)Won	08 Mar 2011	Potter Derek John (Husband, Respondent): Share in Sommerville Park increasedHusband's share in Sommerville Park increased from one-third to half.
2	Chan Teck Hock David v Leong Mei Chuan: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Stock Options & Child Custody 15 Jan 2002 Leong Mei Chuan (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	15 Jan 2002	Leong Mei Chuan (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed to the extent that, in respect of the purchased Dell shares and the profits made under the first category stock options, her entitlement thereto shall be 30% instead of 15%.
3	Leong Mei Chuan v David Chan Teck Hock: Appeal on Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance 24 Apr 2001 Leong Mei Chuan (Appellant, Petitioner)Partial	24 Apr 2001	Leong Mei Chuan (Appellant, Petitioner): Appeal allowed in partMaintenance to be paid by the Husband to the Wife is $3,000 per month, effective from 1 January 2000. The 2nd Maintenance Order ceases to apply with effect from 1 January 2000. Wife is entitled to 15% of the net gain from stock options. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Leong Mei Chuan v Chan Teck Hock David: Amendment of Notice of Appeal in Matrimonial Asset Division 07 Feb 2001 Leong Mei Chuan (Appellant)Won	07 Feb 2001	Leong Mei Chuan (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the court found that the lower court applied overly stringent standards in dismissing the application to amend the notice of appeal.
5	Leong Mei Chuan v David Chan Texk Hock: Appeal of Ancillary Orders in Divorce - Division of Dell Stock Options 24 Jul 2000 Leong Mei Chuan (Petitioner, Appellant)Lost	24 Jul 2000	Leong Mei Chuan (Petitioner, Appellant): Application to amend the Notice of Appeal was dismissedThe appellant's application to amend the Notice of Appeal was dismissed due to the long and unmitigated delay and the difficulty of seeking a division of shares the respondent did not possess.