Valerie Tan

Valerie Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 22.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 57% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Valerie Tan has demonstrated expertise across 39 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied term	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Warranty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunction to Restrain Winding-Up Petition	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Put Option	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Memorandum of Lien	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Solicitor-client privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Valerie Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Valerie Tan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill	5 cases	71% of cases	CDIB Venture Investment v Soeryadjaya: Put Option Dispute in Share Purchase Agreement(Sep 2003) Ng Sing King v PSA International: Striking Out Claims Against Non-Shareholders in Oppression Action(Mar 2003) Datawork Pte Ltd v Cyberinc Pte Ltd: Distributorship Agreement Dispute(Jun 2002)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Winding-Up Petition & Bona Fide Cross-Claim Dispute(Feb 2007)
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	14% of cases	Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation(Apr 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Valerie Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.3
Complex Cases: 4 (57%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.5 parties avg	3.5	57%
Neutral	112.0 parties avg	12.0	14%
Partial	25.5 parties avg	5.5	29%
Won	26.8 parties avg	6.8	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2002	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	28.0 parties avg	8.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Valerie Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(44%)	44%
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Partial	2(22%)	22%
Won	2(22%)	22%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
AUD	7,000,000.00	7,000,000.001 cases	1
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2003	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Metalform Asia v Holland Leedon: Winding-Up Petition & Bona Fide Cross-Claim Dispute 12 Feb 2007 Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	12 Feb 2007	Holland Leedon Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs below and on appeal to follow the event, and the usual consequential orders. The court found that Metalform Asia had a genuine cross-claim based on substantial grounds and that the filing of a winding-up petition would likely cause irreparable harm to Metalform Asia's business and reputation. The court also found that Holland Leedon had not shown any special circumstances why the court should not restrain them from presenting a winding-up petition against Metalform Asia. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
2	CDIB Venture Investment v Soeryadjaya: Put Option Dispute in Share Purchase Agreement 14 Sep 2003 Bradley Fraser (Defendant)Lost	14 Sep 2003	Bradley Fraser (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the defendant regarding the JGL shares; A$7 million payable for the transfer of the JGL shares back to the defendants.
3	Ng Sing King v PSA International: Striking Out Claims Against Non-Shareholders in Oppression Action 17 Mar 2003 Elogicity International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	17 Mar 2003	Elogicity International Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralThe Fifth Defendant was not involved in these applications and was therefore unrepresented at the hearing of these appeals.
4	Datawork Pte Ltd v Cyberinc Pte Ltd: Distributorship Agreement Dispute 24 Jun 2002 Cyberinc Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	24 Jun 2002	Cyberinc Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartCyberinc's appeal was allowed in part. Cyberinc was entitled to be paid for the 400 units delivered to Datawork and damages to be assessed in respect of 600 units which Datawork had ordered but did not want delivery of and damages to be assessed for Datawork's failure to order 1,700 sets to make up the minimum quantity of 3,000 units. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Han Min v First Commercial Bank: Lien Validity & Bank's Duty of Care 19 May 2002 First Commercial Bank (Defendant, Third Party)Lost	19 May 2002	First Commercial Bank (Defendant, Third Party): Claims DismissedThe court declared that the memoranda are not binding on the plaintiff and ordered that his deposits are to be restored together with such interest which would have accrued had they not been uplifted. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Foo Ko Hing v Foo Chee Heng: Interrogatories, Solicitor-Client Privilege & Relevance in Share Purchase Dispute 10 Apr 2002 Foo Chee Heng (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	10 Apr 2002	Foo Chee Heng (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedDefendant's position was not upheld on appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation 23 Apr 2000 Business Software Alliance (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	23 Apr 2000	Business Software Alliance (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the right to seek discovery, but the specific discovery requests were deemed too broad. Applications remitted for reconsideration. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).