Valliappan Subramaniam

Valliappan Subramaniam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and building and construction industry security of payment act. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Valliappan Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Valliappan Subramaniam has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Veritas Law Corporation	3 cases	75% of cases	Orion-One v Dong Cheng: Post-Termination Payment Claim Validity under SOPA and REDAS Conditions in Construction Contract Dispute(Dec 2020) Zuraimi v Zulkarnine: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Investment Losses in Halal F&B Companies(Oct 2020) CEQ v CER: Stay of Enforcement of Adjudication Determination Pending Appeal and Arbitration(Sep 2020)
United Legal Alliance LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Sunray Woodcraft v Like Building Materials: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Premature Application(Sep 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Valliappan Subramaniam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	33.3 parties avg	3.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Valliappan Subramaniam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	550,000.00	275,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Orion-One v Dong Cheng: Post-Termination Payment Claim Validity under SOPA and REDAS Conditions in Construction Contract Dispute 21 Dec 2020 Orion-One Residential Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Won	21 Dec 2020	Orion-One Residential Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedOrion-One's appeal in CA 13 was allowed and Dong Cheng's appeal in CA 112 was dismissed. Costs of $50,000 awarded in favor of Orion-One, inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Zuraimi v Zulkarnine: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Investment Losses in Halal F&B Companies 11 Oct 2020 Elly Sabrina binte Ismail (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Oct 2020	Elly Sabrina binte Ismail (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
3	CEQ v CER: Stay of Enforcement of Adjudication Determination Pending Appeal and Arbitration 13 Sep 2020 CEQ (Applicant)Won	13 Sep 2020	CEQ (Applicant): Application allowedApplication for stay of enforcement of adjudication determination granted. A sum of $500,000 to be released to the Applicant’s solicitors, to be utilised towards the Respondent’s legal fees and disbursements in both the appeal and arbitration. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Sunray Woodcraft v Like Building Materials: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Premature Application 09 Sep 2018 Sunray Woodcraft Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	09 Sep 2018	Sunray Woodcraft Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedThe Applicant's application to set aside the adjudicator's determination was allowed.