Victor Leong

Victor Leong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in abuse of process and damages assessment. Their track record shows a 64.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 71% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Victor Leong has demonstrated expertise across 62 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	8 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	7 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	7 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	6 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Production of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-compliance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agreements for leases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service of document	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fictitious Purchase Scheme	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Victor Leong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Victor Leong has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Audent Chambers LLC	11 cases	79% of cases	True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Fiduciary & Contractual Duties(Sep 2024) Eurofins Mechem v Quek Sze Wei: Summary Judgment Appeal on Factual Concessions(Sep 2024) True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Lifting Riddick Undertaking for Hong Kong Proceedings(Apr 2024)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 cases	7% of cases	TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act(Jul 2020)
Chan Kam Foo and Associates	1 cases	7% of cases	Merriwa Nominees v Romar Positioning: Dispute over Joint Venture Account(Aug 2004)
Chan Kam Foo & Associates	1 cases	7% of cases	Teo Teo Lee v Ong Swee Lan: Specific Performance of Lease Agreement Dispute(Aug 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Victor Leong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 10 (71%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.7 parties avg	3.7	21%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	7%
Unknown	16.0 parties avg	6.0	7%
Won	95.1 parties avg	5.1	64%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	45.9 parties avg	5.9
2022	34.9 parties avg	4.9
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	33.9 parties avg	3.9

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Victor Leong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(21%)	21%
Neutral	1(7%)	7%
Unknown	1(7%)	7%
Won	9(64%)	64%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,812,143.32	401,734.767 cases	7
USD	325,326.17	325,326.171 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2022	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Assessment of Damages for Breach of Fiduciary & Contractual Duties 04 Sep 2024 True Fitness Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	04 Sep 2024	True Fitness Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Parties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment.Parties are to instruct their experts to reach an agreement on the value of the plaintiffs’ losses based on the parameters set out in the judgment.
2	Eurofins Mechem v Quek Sze Wei: Summary Judgment Appeal on Factual Concessions 01 Sep 2024 Eurofins Mechem Pte Ltd (Claimant, Respondent)Won	01 Sep 2024	Eurofins Mechem Pte Ltd (Claimant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Eurofins awarded costs of $20,000 plus disbursements of $483.95 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Lifting Riddick Undertaking for Hong Kong Proceedings 24 Apr 2024 True Fitness Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	24 Apr 2024	True Fitness Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application allowedPlaintiffs' application allowed, for the sole purpose of allowing the Hong Kong Court to determine whether there had been a breach of its court order in HCA 1469/2019. Costs here and below are reserved to the trial judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Milaha Explorer Pte Ltd v Pengrui Leasing: Appeal Over Mareva Injunction in Ship Sale Dispute 19 Feb 2023 Milaha Explorer Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	19 Feb 2023	Milaha Explorer Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Mareva injunction set aside; costs awarded to Milaha Explorer Pte Ltd fixed at $45,000 (inclusive of disbursements) for its costs here and below. Pengrui was ordered to refund the costs below paid by Milaha. The usual consequential orders applied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Director's Duties, Breach of Contract, and Wrongful Termination 04 Jul 2022 True Fitness Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	04 Jul 2022	True Fitness Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff on breach of dutiesJudgment for Plaintiff on breach of duties; The quantification of the plaintiff’s losses would be determined at a later date unless parties are able to resolve that issue by agreement or mediation. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Tan Seng Kee v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A Penal Code & Freedom of Expression 27 Feb 2022 Choong Chee Hong (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	27 Feb 2022	Choong Chee Hong (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Section 377A deemed unenforceable unless Attorney-General signals change in prosecutorial policy.
7	Yihua Lifestyle Technology Co v Phua Yong Tat: Amendment of Pleadings & Fraudulent Misrepresentation 30 Jan 2022 Golden Hill Capital Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Jan 2022	Golden Hill Capital Pte Ltd (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe defendants' appeal against the decision to allow the plaintiffs to amend their statement of claim was allowed.
8	Yihua Lifestyle v HTL International: Judicial Management & Discretion of Judicial Managers 07 Sep 2021 Golden Hill Capital Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	07 Sep 2021	Golden Hill Capital Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
9	Golden Hill Capital v Yihua Lifestyle: Appeal on Judicial Management & Asset Sale 29 Aug 2021 Phua Yong Tat (Applicant)	29 Aug 2021	Phua Yong Tat (Applicant): -
10	Bank of China v BP Singapore: Negligence, Fraud & Letter of Credit Dispute 30 May 2021 BP Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	30 May 2021	BP Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedBP's appeal was dismissed, and the Bank's claims against it were reinstated.
11	HTL International Holdings: Upholding Judicial Manager's Asset Sale Decision 14 Apr 2021 Golden Hill Capital Pte Ltd (Other)Won	14 Apr 2021	Golden Hill Capital Pte Ltd (Other): Costs AwardedCosts of S$18,000 awarded to the Phua Group (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	TYN Investment Group v ERC Holdings: Mareva Injunction & Arbitration Act 27 Jul 2020 TYN Investment Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jul 2020	TYN Investment Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Mareva Injunction GrantedMareva injunction granted against the first defendant up to the limit of $2,693,143.32 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Merriwa Nominees v Romar Positioning: Dispute over Joint Venture Account 12 Aug 2004 Romar Positioning Equipment Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	12 Aug 2004	Romar Positioning Equipment Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against the DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; the Defendant was ordered to pay the Plaintiff US$325,326.17.
14	Teo Teo Lee v Ong Swee Lan: Specific Performance of Lease Agreement Dispute 15 Aug 2002 Teo Teo Lee (Plaintiff)Won	15 Aug 2002	Teo Teo Lee (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedPlaintiff's claim for specific performance of the lease agreement was allowed with costs. The court ordered specific performance of the agreement. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.