Vijay Kumar Rai

Vijay Kumar Rai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and negligence. Their track record shows a 15.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated expertise across 79 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and costs.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	11 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Costs	9 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Similar fact evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor and Client Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum of costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigant-in-person	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's fees	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Lien	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diagnosis	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Standard of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hospital Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Diagnosis	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination of Employment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Engineering Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Molestation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Safe system of work	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Health Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vijay Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vijay Kumar Rai has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Arbiters Inc Law Corporation	10 cases	50% of cases	Arbiters Inc Law Corp v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph: Taxation of Legal Fees in Negligence Suit(Jan 2024) Arokiasamy Steven Joseph v Lee Boon Chuan Nelson: Costs for Dismissed Summonses(Oct 2023) Arokiasamy Steven Joseph v Lee Boon Chuan Nelson: Negligence Claim for Suicide of Salvin Foster Steven(Aug 2023)
V K Rai & Partners	4 cases	20% of cases	Tan Seow Cheng v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd: Pleadings and Particulars in Defamation Claim(Feb 2003) Hui Cheng Wan Agnes v Nippon SP Tech: Wrongful Dismissal & Termination of Employment Contract(Sep 2001) Hui Cheng Wan Agnes v Nippon SP Tech: Wrongful Dismissal Claim Over Defamation Suit(Jul 2001)
Engelin Teh Practice LLC	3 cases	15% of cases	Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence, Breach of Duty, and Delayed Lung Cancer Diagnosis(Feb 2019) Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence Claim & Costs Allocation(Jun 2018) Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence in Lung Cancer Diagnosis(Feb 2018)
V K Rai and Partners	3 cases	15% of cases	Johnson Pacific v Hogberg: Costs, Pleadings & Particulars in Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duty Claim(Aug 2004) Cheong Ghim Fah v Murugian: Taxation of Costs on High Court Scale for Subordinate Court Jurisdiction(Jun 2004) Cheong Ghim Fah v Murugian: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Highway Code Breach in Pedestrian Road Accident(Feb 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vijay Kumar Rai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 8 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Consent	15.0 parties avg	5.0	5%
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Lost	104.7 parties avg	4.7	50%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Partial	43.5 parties avg	3.5	20%
Won	34.8 parties avg	4.8	15%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2009	29.3 parties avg	9.3
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vijay Kumar Rai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Consent	1(5%)	5%
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	10(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	4(20%)	20%
Won	3(15%)	15%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	740,204.95	82,244.999 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2023	2 11	Consent: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Arbiters Inc Law Corp v Arokiasamy Steven Joseph: Taxation of Legal Fees in Negligence Suit 30 Jan 2024 Arbiters Inc Law Corporation (Applicant)Partial	30 Jan 2024	Arbiters Inc Law Corporation (Applicant): Fees fixedThe court ordered that the applicant's fees be fixed at $60,000 inclusive of reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Arokiasamy Steven Joseph v Lee Boon Chuan Nelson: Costs for Dismissed Summonses 12 Oct 2023 Arokiasamy Steven Joseph (Plaintiff)Won	12 Oct 2023	Arokiasamy Steven Joseph (Plaintiff): Costs awardedCosts of $500 awarded to the first plaintiff, to be paid by Arbiters Inc Law Corporation (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Arokiasamy Steven Joseph v Lee Boon Chuan Nelson: Negligence Claim for Suicide of Salvin Foster Steven 24 Aug 2023 Arokiasamy Steven Joseph (Plaintiff)Consent	24 Aug 2023	Arokiasamy Steven Joseph (Plaintiff): Leave to discontinue suit grantedBy consent, the plaintiffs were given leave to discontinue this suit in accordance with the terms of settlement reached between them and the 1st and 3rd defendants.
4	Soh Keng Cheang Philip v National University Hospital: Clarification on Outstanding Hospital Bills 27 Oct 2021 Soh Keng Cheang Philip (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Oct 2021	Soh Keng Cheang Philip (Plaintiff): Counterclaim AllowedJudgment for the defendant on its counterclaim for outstanding hospital bills amounting to $26,463.73 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Soh Keng Cheang Philip v National University Hospital: Negligence Claim for Failure to Diagnose Cervical Myelopathy 25 Oct 2021 Soh Keng Cheang Philip (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Oct 2021	Soh Keng Cheang Philip (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence, Causation, Damages in Lung Cancer Misdiagnosis 18 Jan 2021 Azmi Bin Abdul Rahman (Plaintiff)Won	18 Jan 2021	Azmi Bin Abdul Rahman (Plaintiff): Judgment for the EstateJudgment for the Estate; damages awarded in the amount of $326,620.61 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence, Breach of Duty, and Delayed Lung Cancer Diagnosis 25 Feb 2019 Noor Azlin Binte Abdul Rahman (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	25 Feb 2019	Noor Azlin Binte Abdul Rahman (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part against Changi General Hospital; the issue of loss and damage, including the quantum of damages to be awarded (if any), is remitted to the Judge for her decision.
8	Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence Claim & Costs Allocation 20 Jun 2018 Noor Azlin Binte Abdul Rahman (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Jun 2018	Noor Azlin Binte Abdul Rahman (Plaintiff): Costs to be paid to defendantsPlaintiff is ordered to pay the defendants' costs of the action. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence in Lung Cancer Diagnosis 13 Feb 2018 Noor Azlin Binte Abdul Rahman (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Feb 2018	Noor Azlin Binte Abdul Rahman (Plaintiff): Action dismissedPlaintiff's claim against all defendants was dismissed.
10	Toh Her Chiew v Grand Isle Holdings: Misrepresentation in Property Sale 02 Oct 2012 Toh Her Chiew (Zhuo Huoshu) and another (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Oct 2012	Toh Her Chiew (Zhuo Huoshu) and another (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in partPlaintiffs' appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part.
11	Mohamed Amin v Lim Choon Thye: Collective Sale Approval & Costs Dispute 17 Nov 2010 Lim Choon Thye and others (Defendant)Neutral	17 Nov 2010	Lim Choon Thye and others (Defendant): No order as to costsThe court determined that no order as to costs should be made in Originating Summons 17 of 2008.
12	Mohamed Amin v Lim Choon Thye: Collective Sale Dispute over Unstamped Agreement 24 Sep 2009 Vijay Kumar Rai (Defendant)Lost	24 Sep 2009	Vijay Kumar Rai (Defendant): Summons dismissed with costsThe Present Summons was dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
13	Yu Eng Chin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence for Molestation 08 Mar 2009 Yu Eng Chin (Appellant)Lost	08 Mar 2009	Yu Eng Chin (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
14	Johnson Pacific v Hogberg: Costs, Pleadings & Particulars in Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duty Claim 03 Aug 2004 Johnson Pacific Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	03 Aug 2004	Johnson Pacific Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part regarding the request for particulars. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Cheong Ghim Fah v Murugian: Taxation of Costs on High Court Scale for Subordinate Court Jurisdiction 10 Jun 2004 Murugian s/o Rangasamy (Defendant)Lost	10 Jun 2004	Murugian s/o Rangasamy (Defendant): Costs to be taxed on the High Court scalePlaintiffs were entitled to have commenced the subject proceedings in the High Court and directed that the plaintiffs’ costs be assessed on the High Court scale. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Cheong Ghim Fah v Murugian: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Highway Code Breach in Pedestrian Road Accident 06 Feb 2004 Murugian s/o Rangasamy (Defendant)Lost	06 Feb 2004	Murugian s/o Rangasamy (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the defendant, with liability apportioned 85% to the defendant and 15% to the deceased. Damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Tan Seow Cheng v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd: Pleadings and Particulars in Defamation Claim 20 Feb 2003 Tan Seow Cheng (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Feb 2003	Tan Seow Cheng (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed except for one variation regarding the place where the remarks were made.
18	Hui Cheng Wan Agnes v Nippon SP Tech: Wrongful Dismissal & Termination of Employment Contract 17 Sep 2001 Hui Cheng Wan Agnes (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Sep 2001	Hui Cheng Wan Agnes (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for wrongful dismissal was dismissed.
19	Hui Cheng Wan Agnes v Nippon SP Tech: Wrongful Dismissal Claim Over Defamation Suit 30 Jul 2001 Hui Cheng Wan Agnes (Plaintiff)Dismissed	30 Jul 2001	Hui Cheng Wan Agnes (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff's claim for wrongful dismissal was dismissed.
20	Phang Fook Seng v Attorney-General of Singapore: Claim for Damages Due to Injury During National Service 29 May 2000 Phang Fook Seng (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	29 May 2000	Phang Fook Seng (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the order striking out his claim was allowed, and the orders below were set aside.