Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence Claim & Costs Allocation
In a civil suit between Noor Azlin Binte Abdul Rahman and Changi General Hospital Pte Ltd and others, the High Court of Singapore, on 21 June 2018, ruled on the allocation of costs following a judgment where the defendants were found not liable for negligence. The court ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs, including an uplift for an Offer to Settle, determining specific amounts for the hospital and the doctors involved.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Plaintiff to pay the defendants’ costs of the action on an indemnity basis from the date of service of the Offer to Settle, with a 5% uplift.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Supplementary Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Singapore court allocates costs in a negligence claim after dismissing the plaintiff's case against Changi General Hospital and others.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noor Azlin Binte Abdul Rahman | Plaintiff | Individual | Costs to be paid to defendants | Lost | |
Changi General Hospital Pte Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Costs awarded | Won | |
Imran Bin Mohamed Noor | Defendant | Individual | Costs awarded | Won | |
Yap Hsiang | Defendant | Individual | Costs awarded | Won | |
Soh Wei Wen, Jason | Defendant | Individual | Costs awarded | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Belinda Ang Saw Ean | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- The substantive judgment found in favor of the defendants on the issue of liability.
- The plaintiff argued costs should be awarded to her because a duty of care and breach were established.
- The defendants made a Joint Offer to Settle for $300,000 before trial, which the plaintiff rejected.
- The defendants sought costs on an indemnity basis from the date of service of the Offer to Settle.
- The court determined costs and did not send the matter for taxation.
- The court found the Offer to Settle was valid despite being silent on costs.
- The court granted a 5% uplift on fixed costs due to the lateness of the Offer to Settle.
5. Formal Citations
- Noor Azlin Bte Abdul Rahman v Changi General Hospital Pte Ltd and others, Suit No 59 of 2015, [2018] SGHC 146
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Joint Offer to Settle filed and served | |
Trial began | |
Judgment reserved | |
Judgment issued |
7. Legal Issues
- Allocation of Costs
- Outcome: The court ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs of the action on an indemnity basis from the date of service of the Offer to Settle, with a 5% uplift.
- Category: Procedural
- Offer to Settle
- Outcome: The court found the Offer to Settle to be valid and applicable for determining costs.
- Category: Procedural
8. Remedies Sought
- Costs
9. Cause of Actions
- Negligence
10. Practice Areas
- Litigation
11. Industries
- Healthcare
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noor Azlin Bte Abdul Rahman v Changi General Hospital Pte Ltd and others | High Court | Yes | [2018] SGHC 35 | Singapore | Refers to the substantive judgment where the court found in favour of the defendants on the issue of liability. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
Order 22A r 9 of the Rules of Court |
Order 22A r 10 of the Rules of Court |
O 22A r 9(2)(b) |
O 22A r 8 |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R5, 2014 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Costs
- Offer to Settle
- Indemnity Basis
- Uplift
- Taxation
- Joint Offer
- Duty of Care
- Breach of Duty
- Causation
15.2 Keywords
- costs
- offer to settle
- negligence
- medical negligence
- singapore
- high court
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Costs | 90 |
Civil Practice | 75 |
Civil Procedure | 75 |
Offer to Settle | 75 |
Negligence | 40 |
16. Subjects
- Civil Procedure
- Costs
- Offer to Settle