Vikram Nair

Vikram Nair is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 15 complex cases, representing 63% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vikram Nair has demonstrated expertise across 97 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	15 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 15 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	13 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Substratum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pledge of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Pledgee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reflective Loss	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charitable Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Running Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidator Appointment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Advice Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity of Redemption	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Redundancy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disputed Debt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Triable Issues	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrotham Park damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair Contract Terms Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Compulsory Acquisition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Piercing corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share of Profit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Third party proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directorial Misfeasance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discrimination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vikram Nair has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vikram Nair has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 22 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	22 cases	92% of cases	Virgilio Tarrago Da Silveira v Hashstacs: Misrepresentation, Negligence, Unjust Enrichment, Conspiracy, Cryptocurrency(Dec 2024) Pandey v Bothra: Summary Judgment Appeal on Property Purchase Price & Limitation Act(Mar 2024) Farzin Ratan Karma v Helen Campos: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties(Feb 2024)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 cases	4% of cases	Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General: Constitutional Challenge to Temple Land Acquisition(May 2008)
Allen & Gledhill	1 cases	4% of cases	Beckkett v Deutsche Bank: Duty of Pledgee, Undervalue Sale of Shares, and Conspiracy Claim(Sep 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vikram Nair's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.9
Complex Cases: 15 (63%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	108.0 parties avg	8.0	42%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	4%
Partial	53.9 parties avg	3.9	21%
Won	104.2 parties avg	4.2	42%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	311.3 parties avg	11.3
2018	34.3 parties avg	4.3
2019	34.5 parties avg	4.5
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2023	44.3 parties avg	4.3
2024	33.8 parties avg	3.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vikram Nair's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(38%)	38%
Neutral	1(4%)	4%
Partial	5(19%)	19%
Won	10(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,929,125.40	137,794.6714 cases	14

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2018	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2019	4 121	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2021	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2023	4 1111	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2024	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 24 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Virgilio Tarrago Da Silveira v Hashstacs: Misrepresentation, Negligence, Unjust Enrichment, Conspiracy, Cryptocurrency 15 Dec 2024 Soh Kai Jun (Defendant)Won	15 Dec 2024	Soh Kai Jun (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; action dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Pandey v Bothra: Summary Judgment Appeal on Property Purchase Price & Limitation Act 26 Mar 2024 Divya Bothra (Defendant, Claimant in Counterclaim, Appellant)Lost	26 Mar 2024	Divya Bothra (Defendant, Claimant in Counterclaim, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against summary judgment dismissed.
3	Farzin Ratan Karma v Helen Campos: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties 12 Feb 2024 MC Accounting Services Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	12 Feb 2024	MC Accounting Services Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Partially AllowedDefendant's counterclaim against the plaintiff is partially allowed. The plaintiff is ordered to make equitable compensation to MCCS amounting to S$24,656.26.
4	Arif Rahim Valibhoy v Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura: Judicial Review of Trustee Removal 30 Nov 2023 Vali Mohamed Shariff Valibhoy (Respondent)Neutral	30 Nov 2023	Vali Mohamed Shariff Valibhoy (Respondent): Joined as RespondentJoined as respondent and directed to file a summons supported by an affidavit to make clear their position that in the event the MUIS Decisions were quashed, such a quashing order is not severable and must extend to them.
5	Pandey v Bothra: Amendment of Defence and Counterclaim Post-Summary Judgment 26 Nov 2023 Divya Bothra (Defendant, Claimant in Counterclaim, Appellant)Partial	26 Nov 2023	Divya Bothra (Defendant, Claimant in Counterclaim, Appellant): SUM 3265 allowed in partSUM 3265 allowed in part (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Rashmi Bothra v SuntecCity Thirty: Winding Up & Liquidator Appointment Dispute 07 Nov 2023 Rashmi Bothra (Appellant, Claimant)Won	07 Nov 2023	Rashmi Bothra (Appellant, Claimant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the court set aside the Judge’s appointment of the PTs’ nominees as liquidators.
7	RB Investments v Kardachi: Legal Advice Privilege & Bankruptcy Investigation 28 Sep 2023 RB Investments Pte Ltd (Claimant)Lost	28 Sep 2023	RB Investments Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application DismissedRBI's application to expunge documents and prohibit their use was dismissed.
8	Nair v Glaxosmithkline: Breach of Employment Agreement & Employer's Duty of Mutual Trust 17 Oct 2022 Kallivalap Praveen Nair (Plaintiff)Lost	17 Oct 2022	Kallivalap Praveen Nair (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claims for breach of employment agreement, discrimination, and lost opportunities were dismissed.
9	Energy Resource Investment Pte Ltd v International Golf Resorts Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application & Disputed Debt 08 Jun 2022 International Golf Resorts Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	08 Jun 2022	International Golf Resorts Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding-up Application DismissedWinding-up application dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Phua Seng Hua v Peter Kwee Seng Chio: Appeal on Tort of Deceit, Negligence, and Breach of Contract Regarding Clubhouse Redevelopment 10 Mar 2022 Exklusiv Resorts Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	10 Mar 2022	Exklusiv Resorts Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
11	Meow Moy Lan v Exklusiv Resorts: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation & Club Relocation Dispute 29 Jun 2021 Peter Kwee Seng Chio (Defendant)Won	29 Jun 2021	Peter Kwee Seng Chio (Defendant): Claims dismissedClaims for deceit, negligent misrepresentation, and negligence dismissed.
12	Griffin Real Estate v. ERC Unicampus: Account of Profits for Big Hotel Sale 23 Oct 2019 ERC Unicampus Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant)Partial	23 Oct 2019	ERC Unicampus Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe court allowed the appeal in part by not deducting the UOB-ERCU Loan in the first half of the equation. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
13	Swee Wan Enterprises v Yak Thye Peng: Debt Claim, Minority Oppression & Director's Duties 11 Jun 2019 Swee Wan Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant in counterclaim)Won	11 Jun 2019	Swee Wan Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant in counterclaim): Counterclaim dismissedCounterclaim against SWT dismissed.
14	Asplenium Land v Lam Chye Shing: Legal Professional Privilege for In-House Counsel 21 Feb 2019 CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	21 Feb 2019	CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application AllowedApplication allowed; declaratory and injunctive reliefs granted in respect of the Item 3 and Item 4 documents. Costs of the application and reasonable disbursements to be paid by CKR to Asplenium, the quantum of which was to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Griffin Real Estate v ERC Unicampus: Res Judicata, Issue Estoppel, Account for Third Party Liability 17 Dec 2018 ERC Unicampus Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	17 Dec 2018	ERC Unicampus Pte Ltd (Defendant): Account of profits orderedOrdered to provide an account of profits gained as a result of its knowing receipt of the $10m loan. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Ho Yew Kong v ERC Holdings: Trust, Disclaimer, Quistclose Trust & Constructive Trust 26 Nov 2018 ERC Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	26 Nov 2018	ERC Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantCourt held that the GREIC shares are held on resulting trust in favour of ERC Holdings Pte Ltd.
17	Foo v ERC Prime II: Winding Up, Directorial Misfeasance & Loss of Confidence 21 Oct 2018 Gryphon Real Estate Investment Corporation Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	21 Oct 2018	Gryphon Real Estate Investment Corporation Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; winding up of GREIC ordered.
18	Swee Wan Enterprises v Yak Thye Peng: Admissibility of 'Without Prejudice' Communications 07 Dec 2017 Swee Wan Enterprises Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Dec 2017	Swee Wan Enterprises Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed, and the defendant's appeal against the Assistant Registrar's decision was allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
19	Foo Peow Yong Douglas v ERC Prime II Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application Dismissed 15 Nov 2017 ERC Prime II Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	15 Nov 2017	ERC Prime II Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedThe application to wind up the company was dismissed; costs of $10,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the company (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Sakae Holdings Ltd v Gryphon Real Estate: Oppression of Minority Shareholders & Director's Fiduciary Duties 03 May 2017 ERC Consulting Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	03 May 2017	ERC Consulting Pte Ltd (Defendant): Unsuccessful in defending the claimsERC Consulting Pte Ltd was unsuccessful in defending the claims against it.
21	Ting Shwu Ping v Scanone Pte Ltd: Winding Up on Just and Equitable Ground 28 Nov 2016 AUTOPACK PTE LTD (Defendant)Won	28 Nov 2016	AUTOPACK PTE LTD (Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Ting Shwu Ping v Autopack Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application and Buy-Out Provision under Companies Act 21 Jan 2016 SCANONE PTE LTD (Defendant)Won	21 Jan 2016	SCANONE PTE LTD (Defendant): Application dismissedThe application to wind up the company was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the company.
23	Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General: Constitutional Challenge to Temple Land Acquisition 08 May 2008 Ang Beng Woon (Plaintiff)Lost	08 May 2008	Ang Beng Woon (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Beckkett v Deutsche Bank: Duty of Pledgee, Undervalue Sale of Shares, and Conspiracy Claim 20 Sep 2007 Deutsche Bank AG (Defendant)Lost	20 Sep 2007	Deutsche Bank AG (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDeutsche Bank's counterclaim against Beckkett was dismissed.