Vivian Chew

Vivian Chew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2007. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insurance and personal injury. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vivian Chew has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Court Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Vivian Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vivian Chew has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Assomull & Partners	7 cases	100% of cases	Tan Sia Boo v Ong Chiang Kwong: Appeal on Assessment of Damages and Admissibility of Fresh Evidence(Aug 2007) NTUC Income v Toh Kheng Boon: Motor Insurance, Use for Reward & Amendment of Pleadings(Jul 2007) Lock Han Chng Jonathan v Goh Jessiline: Jurisdiction of Settlement Judge in Court Dispute Resolution(Apr 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vivian Chew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.5 parties avg	3.5	43%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	29%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2006	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2007	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vivian Chew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Partial	2(29%)	29%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	70,000.00	23,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Sia Boo v Ong Chiang Kwong: Appeal on Assessment of Damages and Admissibility of Fresh Evidence 15 Aug 2007 Ong Chiang Kwong (Defendant)Lost	15 Aug 2007	Ong Chiang Kwong (Defendant): Application to adduce fresh evidence dismissedThe defendant's application to adduce new evidence at the hearing of the appeals was dismissed.
2	NTUC Income v Toh Kheng Boon: Motor Insurance, Use for Reward & Amendment of Pleadings 22 Jul 2007 NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd (Appellant)Partial	22 Jul 2007	NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe district judge's order for NTUC Income to indemnify the owners of the lorries involved in the accident was overruled.
3	Lock Han Chng Jonathan v Goh Jessiline: Jurisdiction of Settlement Judge in Court Dispute Resolution 26 Apr 2007 Goh Jessiline (Defendant, Appellant)Won	26 Apr 2007	Goh Jessiline (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs to be taxed unless otherwise agreed. The Order of Court is set aside together with the execution proceedings in writ of seizure and sale no. 2057 of 2006. The plaintiff is ordered to reimburse the defendant all costs and disbursements paid by the defendant towards the Order of Court and the writ of seizure and sale, with interest at 6% from the date of the defendant’s payment until date of refund. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Hin Hup Bus Service v Tay Chwee Hiang: Vicarious Liability & Fraudulent Claims in Road Accidents 24 Sep 2006 Hin Hup Bus Service (a firm) (Appellant, Defendant)Won	24 Sep 2006	Hin Hup Bus Service (a firm) (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; judgment below set aside; order for costs below reversed in favor of the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Chin Tyng Lei v Lim Yoon Ngok: Summary Judgment and Loan Dispute 11 Jul 2006 Chin Tyng Lei (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	11 Jul 2006	Chin Tyng Lei (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $70,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Standard Chartered Bank v Elang Mas: Mortgage, Banking Facilities & Default 22 Aug 2003 Indah Nathania Tantio (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	22 Aug 2003	Indah Nathania Tantio (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the Senior Assistant Registrar was dismissed with costs on an indemnity basis.
7	Focus Electronics v Touch Universal: Validity of Sale Agreement & Caveat 23 Aug 2000 Focus Electronics Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Aug 2000	Focus Electronics Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Action DismissedPlaintiffs' action to invalidate the sale agreement and remove the caveat was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.