Wah Hsien-Wen Terence

Wah Hsien-Wen Terence is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and rescission. Their track record shows a 83.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Rescission	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Grant of letters of administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Incomplete Gifts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence on appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Stakeholding	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wah Hsien-Wen Terence has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	5 cases	83% of cases	Chiang Ai Ling v Tan Kian Chye: Sham Agreements & Conspiracy in Matrimonial Asset Division(Dec 2024) Chye Hwa Luan v Do Allyn T: Striking Out Action Due to Improperly Sued Defendant in Personal Capacity(Jul 2023) WDT v WDS: Appeal on Incomplete Gift & Admissibility of Fresh Evidence(Feb 2023)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	17% of cases	Strait Colonies v SMRT Alpha: Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission in Lease Agreement(Jul 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wah Hsien-Wen Terence's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	52.6 parties avg	2.6	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wah Hsien-Wen Terence's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Won	5(83%)	83%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,524,920.66	1,104,984.135 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chiang Ai Ling v Tan Kian Chye: Sham Agreements & Conspiracy in Matrimonial Asset Division 29 Dec 2024 Ang Siew Yan (Defendant, Claimant in counterclaim)Lost	29 Dec 2024	Ang Siew Yan (Defendant, Claimant in counterclaim): Counterclaims DismissedThe counterclaims for beneficial entitlement to shares and conspiracy were dismissed.
2	Chye Hwa Luan v Do Allyn T: Striking Out Action Due to Improperly Sued Defendant in Personal Capacity 30 Jul 2023 Do Allyn T (Defendant)Won	30 Jul 2023	Do Allyn T (Defendant): Application AllowedDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's claim was allowed.
3	WDT v WDS: Appeal on Incomplete Gift & Admissibility of Fresh Evidence 05 Feb 2023 WDS (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	05 Feb 2023	WDS (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $25,000, inclusive of disbursements, awarded to the respondent.
4	Lau Soon v UOL Development: Stakeholding Sum Dispute & Limitation Act 18 Aug 2021 UOL Development (Dakota) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	18 Aug 2021	UOL Development (Dakota) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; stakeholding sum of S$64,450 to be released to them (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Strait Colonies v SMRT Alpha: Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission in Lease Agreement 03 Jul 2018 SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	03 Jul 2018	SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent for $562,441.31 being outstanding rent and interest as at 1 October 2015, with interest at 12% per year on the principal sum of $538,942.94 from 1 October 2015 until payment, and $2,155,294.02 being damages with interest at 5.33% per year from the date of the writ until judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd v Strait Colonies Pte Ltd: Misrepresentation & Breach of Lease Agreement 02 Oct 2017 SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	02 Oct 2017	SMRT Alpha Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for $562,441.31 being outstanding rent and interest as of 1 October 2015 together with interest at 12% per annum on the principal sum of $538,942.94 from 1 October 2015 until payment, and $2,155,294.02 being damages together with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ until judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.