Chiang Ai Ling v Tan Kian Chye: Sham Agreements & Conspiracy in Matrimonial Asset Division

In Chiang Ai Ling v Tan Kian Chye and Ang Siew Yan, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore heard a claim by Chiang Ai Ling against Tan Kian Chye for failing to pay her $13,727,640.25 for transferring her shares in RYB Engineering Pte Ltd, pursuant to agreements made in 2015 and 2019. Ang Siew Yan, Tan's current wife, counterclaimed that the agreements were a sham to reduce matrimonial assets in her divorce proceedings against Tan, and alleged conspiracy between Chiang and Tan. The court, presided over by Audrey Lim J, dismissed Chiang's claim and Ang's counterclaims, finding the agreements to be sham and conspiracy unproven, and granted Ang's prayer for a declaration that the agreements do not bind her or affect the division of matrimonial assets.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Claim dismissed; counterclaims dismissed; declaration granted.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore court dismisses claim based on sham agreements to reduce matrimonial assets in a divorce, finding conspiracy unproven.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Chiang Ai Ling (Jiang Ailing)Claimant, Defendant in counterclaimIndividualClaim DismissedLost
Tan Kian ChyeDefendant, Defendant in counterclaimIndividualClaim DismissedNeutral
Ang Siew YanDefendant, Claimant in counterclaimIndividualCounterclaims DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Audrey LimJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Chiang claimed Tan failed to pay her for transferring shares in RYB Engineering.
  2. Ang claimed the agreements were a sham to reduce matrimonial assets in her divorce.
  3. Chiang and Tan were previously married and divorced in 2007.
  4. Ang is Tan's current wife and commenced divorce proceedings in December 2022.
  5. RYB Engineering was incorporated in 1996 with Chiang and Tan as directors.
  6. Tan transferred shares to Ang in 2006.
  7. Chiang transferred her shares to Tan in 2015.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Chiang Ai Ling v Tan Kian Chye and another, Originating Claim No 561 of 2023, [2024] SGHC 330

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Chiang and Tan married
RYB Engineering Pte Ltd incorporated
Chiang resigned as director of RYB
Ang joined RYB as a manager
Tan transferred 120,000 shares to Ang
Chiang commenced divorce proceedings against Tan
Court order for ancillary matters in divorce
Final judgment of divorce obtained
Chai resigned as director of RYB
Ang was appointed as director of RYB
Tan and Ang married
RYB share capital increased
Chiang transferred shares to Tan
Ang transferred shares to Tan
Tan entered into SPA with Chudenko
Tan sold 70% of shares to Chudenko
$2m transferred to CKW Account
$4m transferred to CKW Account
Ang left matrimonial home
Ang filed personal protection order against Tan
Tan received second payment from Chudenko
$5m transferred to CKW Account
Ang commenced divorce proceedings against Tan
Interim judgment granted in divorce proceedings
Tan's affidavit of assets and means filed
Letter of demand issued to Tan
Suit commenced
Hearing date
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Sham Agreement
    • Outcome: The court found the alleged agreements to be sham agreements.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Conspiracy
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the claim of conspiracy.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Beneficial Ownership of Shares
    • Outcome: The court found that Ang failed to prove that she was the beneficial owner of the shares held in her name.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages
  2. Declaration

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Conspiracy

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Divorce Litigation

11. Industries

  • Engineering

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Simpson Marine (SEA) Pte Ltd v Jiacipto JiaravanonCourt of AppealYes[2019] 1 SLR 696SingaporeCited regarding the admissibility and relevance of subsequent conduct in ascertaining whether a contract has been formed.
The “Luna” and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2021] 2 SLR 1054SingaporeCited regarding the evidence which the court may consider in cases involving the existence of a contract.
Lim Siau Hing @ Lim Kim Hoe and another v Compass Consulting Pte Ltd and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2023] SGCA 39SingaporeCited regarding the evidence which the court may consider in cases involving the existence of a contract.
Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd v Lim Eng Hock Peter and others and other appealsCourt of AppealYes[2013] 1 SLR 374SingaporeCited for the requirement that conspirators must have caused loss to the claimant in a claim for conspiracy.
Quah Kay Tee v Ong and Co Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[1996] 3 SLR(R) 637SingaporeCited for the requirement that conspirators must have caused loss to the claimant in a claim for conspiracy.
Singapore Shooting Association and others v Singapore Rifle AssociationCourt of AppealYes[2020] 1 SLR 395SingaporeCited regarding legal fees that can be recovered as costs not constituting actionable loss or damage in the tort of conspiracy.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Sham agreement
  • Matrimonial assets
  • Conspiracy
  • Beneficial ownership
  • Share transfer
  • Sale proceeds
  • RYB Engineering Pte Ltd
  • Share Movements
  • 2015 Agreement
  • 2019 Agreement

15.2 Keywords

  • sham agreement
  • conspiracy
  • matrimonial assets
  • share transfer
  • divorce
  • Singapore
  • RYB Engineering

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Tort Law
  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Conspiracy
  • Shareholder Disputes