Wayne Yeo

Wayne Yeo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and legal ethics and professional responsibility. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wayne Yeo has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in injunctions and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Injunctions	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Champerty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual Licence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trespass	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wayne Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wayne Yeo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Sang Cheol Woo v Charles Choi Spackman: Amendment of Defence, Abuse of Process & Riddick Principle(Nov 2024) CSO v CSP: Without Prejudice Privilege & Admissibility of Evidence in Settlement Negotiations(Feb 2023) Aviation Hub Pte Ltd v Danial Higgins: Trespass, Contractual Licence, and Hangarage Fees Dispute(Nov 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wayne Yeo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.4
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Won	27.3 parties avg	7.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	110.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wayne Yeo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	18,000.00	9,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sang Cheol Woo v Charles Choi Spackman: Amendment of Defence, Abuse of Process & Riddick Principle 25 Nov 2024 Kim So Hee (Defendant, Respondent)Won	25 Nov 2024	Kim So Hee (Defendant, Respondent): Leave to amend Defence grantedThe Assistant Registrar granted leave to the 2nd and 3rd Defendants to amend their Defence. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CSO v CSP: Without Prejudice Privilege & Admissibility of Evidence in Settlement Negotiations 07 Feb 2023 CSO (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	07 Feb 2023	CSO (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal Dismissed in partAppeal dismissed, with limitations on the portions of disputed emails that the first defendant could refer to.
3	Aviation Hub Pte Ltd v Danial Higgins: Trespass, Contractual Licence, and Hangarage Fees Dispute 03 Nov 2022 Aviation Hub Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	03 Nov 2022	Aviation Hub Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Prayer (a) allowed in partThe plaintiff is entitled to remove the Aircraft from the Property to a safe and secure location within Singapore from which the Aircraft can be retrieved by the defendant if he so wishes.
4	Law Society of Singapore v Ooi Oon Tat: Disciplinary Proceedings for Negligence 02 Aug 2022 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	02 Aug 2022	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application AllowedThe Law Society's application to sanction the respondent was allowed. Costs fixed in the aggregate sum of $18,000 in favour of the applicant being the costs for OS 1 and also for C3J/SUM 1/2022 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).