Wee Anthony

Wee Anthony is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and contributory negligence. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wee Anthony has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Actuarial Science	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prospective Overruling	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory Judgment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Traffic Incident	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal liability of solicitor for costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Apportionment of Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wee Anthony has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wee Anthony has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Titanium Law Chambers LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	Rajina Sharma v Theyvasigamani: Damages for Severe Brain Injury & Loss of Earnings(Feb 2024) Foo Kok Boon v Ngow Kheong Shen: Prospective Overruling & Causation in Interlocutory Judgments(Jul 2023) Cheng Hoe Soon v Ezekiel Peter Latimer: Negligence Claim Struck Out Due to Solicitor's Conduct(Mar 2023)
United Legal Alliance LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	Ting Jun Heng v Yap Kok Hua: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident(Feb 2021) Ting Jun Heng v Yap Kok Hua: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident(Oct 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wee Anthony's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.0 parties avg	3.0	80%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wee Anthony's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Partial	1(20%)	20%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rajina Sharma v Theyvasigamani: Damages for Severe Brain Injury & Loss of Earnings 12 Feb 2024 Song Teck Chong (Third Party)Partial	12 Feb 2024	Song Teck Chong (Third Party): Indemnification of First DefendantThe third party is to indemnify the first defendant to the extent of 10% of all damages and interest payable to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Foo Kok Boon v Ngow Kheong Shen: Prospective Overruling & Causation in Interlocutory Judgments 11 Jul 2023 Foo Kok Boon (Applicant, Defendant)Lost	11 Jul 2023	Foo Kok Boon (Applicant, Defendant): Application DismissedThe applicant's application to set aside the consent interlocutory judgment was dismissed.
3	Cheng Hoe Soon v Ezekiel Peter Latimer: Negligence Claim Struck Out Due to Solicitor's Conduct 02 Mar 2023 Ezekiel Peter Latimer (formerly practicing in the style of M/S Peter Ezekiel & Co) (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	02 Mar 2023	Ezekiel Peter Latimer (formerly practicing in the style of M/S Peter Ezekiel & Co) (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Plaintiff's SOC was reinstated.
4	Ting Jun Heng v Yap Kok Hua: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident 24 Feb 2021 Ng Li Ning (Defendant)Lost	24 Feb 2021	Ng Li Ning (Defendant): Liability ApportionedThe second defendant was found 35% liable for the plaintiff's injuries. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
5	Ting Jun Heng v Yap Kok Hua: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident 01 Oct 2020 Ng Li Ning (Defendant)Lost	01 Oct 2020	Ng Li Ning (Defendant): Liability ApportionedLiability apportioned at 35%. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.