Wee Pan Lee

Wee Pan Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 10.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 15% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated expertise across 77 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	18 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	14 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	8 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abetment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cheating	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maid Abuse	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Endangered Species Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sudden fight	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Accounts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common Intention Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bail	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Compensation and costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Elements of crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fellatio	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal statutes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common Gaming Houses Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Actus Reus	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contingency Fee Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Flight Risk	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Computer Misuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gas Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carnal Intercourse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Self Defence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Computers and Software	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Import and Export Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maid Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wee Pan Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wee Pan Lee has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wee, Tay & Lim LLP	13 cases	65% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Sentek Marine: Joint Trial for Corruption, Drug Trafficking, and Obstruction of Justice(Dec 2024) Dao Thi Boi v Public Prosecutor: Endangered Species Act & Import Offenses(Nov 2024) PP v Chong Chee Boon Kenneth: Abetment of Rash Act Causing Death in SCDF Kolam Ritual(Jul 2021)
Wee Tay & Lim	5 cases	25% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Leong Soy Yip: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2009) PP v Tan Chee Wee: Murder, Self-Defense & Sudden Fight in Robbery(Oct 2003) Rehana Perveen v Public Prosecutor: Grievous Hurt & Penal Code Interpretation(Jan 2002)
Wee, Tay and Lim LLP	1 cases	5% of cases	Lau Cheng Kai v Public Prosecutor: Conspiracy to Bribe & Prevention of Corruption Act Interpretation(Oct 2018)
Wee Tay and Lim	1 cases	5% of cases	Ong Ting Ting v PP: Maid Abuse Appeal - Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing(Jul 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wee Pan Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 3 (15%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	143.1 parties avg	3.1	70%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5%
Partial	42.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	10%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	33.4 parties avg	3.4
2021	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2024	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wee Pan Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	14(67%)	67%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	4(19%)	19%
Won	2(10%)	10%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	16,800.00	2,800.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Sentek Marine: Joint Trial for Corruption, Drug Trafficking, and Obstruction of Justice 15 Dec 2024 Ng Hock Teck (Respondent)Lost	15 Dec 2024	Ng Hock Teck (Respondent): Application for joint trial grantedThe application for a joint trial, which Ng Hock Teck opposed, was granted.
2	Dao Thi Boi v Public Prosecutor: Endangered Species Act & Import Offenses 07 Nov 2024 Dao Thi Boi (Appellant)Lost	07 Nov 2024	Dao Thi Boi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
3	PP v Chong Chee Boon Kenneth: Abetment of Rash Act Causing Death in SCDF Kolam Ritual 22 Jul 2021 Chong Chee Boon Kenneth (Respondent)Lost	22 Jul 2021	Chong Chee Boon Kenneth (Respondent): ConvictedConvicted on the s 338(a) charges as originally framed.
4	Ong Chai Koon v Ong Chai Soon: Constructive Trust, Resulting Trust & Proprietary Estoppel in Family Property Dispute 05 Apr 2021 Ong Chai Soon (Defendant)Lost	05 Apr 2021	Ong Chai Soon (Defendant): Order for sale of shophouse and equal division of proceedsDefendant ordered to sell the Hougang shophouse in the open market within 12 months. The net proceeds from the sale of the Hougang shophouse shall be distributed amongst the Ong siblings equally.
5	Lau Cheng Kai v Public Prosecutor: Conspiracy to Bribe & Prevention of Corruption Act Interpretation 07 Oct 2018 Samsudin Bin Rais (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	07 Oct 2018	Samsudin Bin Rais (Appellant, Respondent): Sentence increasedOriginal sentence of one month's imprisonment increased to two months' imprisonment.
6	Tay Wee Kiat v Public Prosecutor: Domestic Maid Abuse Compensation Appeal 07 May 2018 Tay Wee Kiat (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	07 May 2018	Tay Wee Kiat (Appellant, Respondent): Compensation orderedTay Wee Kiat was ordered to pay $5,900 in compensation to the victim (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Tay Wee Kiat v Public Prosecutor: Maid Abuse Conviction and Sentencing Appeal 01 Mar 2018 Chia Yun Ling (Appellant, Respondent)Neutral	01 Mar 2018	Chia Yun Ling (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. Prosecution's appeal against sentence dismissed.
8	Bijabahadur Rai v Public Prosecutor: Assisting Illegal Lottery & Common Gaming Houses Act 09 Jul 2017 Bijabahadur Rai s/o Shree Kantrai (Appellant)Partial	09 Jul 2017	Bijabahadur Rai s/o Shree Kantrai (Appellant): Appeal allowed in part, convicted of lesser chargeAppeal against conviction under s 5(a) of the Common Gaming Houses Act allowed. Convicted of a lesser charge under s 9(1) of the CGHA read with ss 107 and 109 of the Penal Code and sentenced to a fine of $1,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Law Society of Singapore v Lau See Jin Jeffrey: Disciplinary Proceedings for Contingency Fee Agreement 19 Feb 2017 Lau See Jin Jeffrey (Respondent)Lost	19 Feb 2017	Lau See Jin Jeffrey (Respondent): Suspended from practiceThe Respondent was suspended from practice for a period of 12 months.
10	Public Prosecutor v Yang Yin: Revision of Bail Order for Falsification of Accounts 07 Jan 2015 YANG YIN (Respondent)Lost	07 Jan 2015	YANG YIN (Respondent): Bail RevokedThe order granting bail to Yang Yin was revoked.
11	Liew Cheong Wee Leslie v Public Prosecutor: Computer Misuse Act & Casino Blackout 24 Jul 2013 Liew Cheong Wee Leslie (Appellant)Partial	24 Jul 2013	Liew Cheong Wee Leslie (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentence on sixth charge variedAppeal against conviction dismissed. Sentence on sixth charge varied to a fine of $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	PP v Ong Eng Teck: Cheating; Skills Development Fund; False Employment; Penal Code s 420 29 Nov 2012 Ong Eng Teck (Respondent)Lost	29 Nov 2012	Ong Eng Teck (Respondent): Convicted on three chargesConvicted on the 2nd, 19th, and 33rd charges. Acquitted on the 5th, 6th, 41st, 42nd, and 43rd charges.
13	JS Metal v Public Prosecutor: Gas Act Violation & Earthworks Damage 20 Jul 2011 JS Metal Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	20 Jul 2011	JS Metal Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partFine of $100,000 for the s 32A(2) offence is set aside and substituted with a fine of $5,000. The fine of $10,000 for the s 32(3)(a) offence is affirmed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	PP v Lee Chee Soon Peter: Application of Similar Fact Evidence in Sexual Offence Case 24 Oct 2010 Lee Chee Soon Peter (Defense)Won	24 Oct 2010	Lee Chee Soon Peter (Defense): AcquittedThe Accused was found not guilty and acquitted.
15	Public Prosecutor v Leong Soy Yip: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Sep 2009 Yip Mun Hei (Defendant)Lost	28 Sep 2009	Yip Mun Hei (Defendant): ConvictionYip Mun Hei was convicted on the capital charge of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
16	Ong Ting Ting v PP: Maid Abuse Appeal - Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing 27 Jul 2004 Ong Ting Ting (Appellant)Lost	27 Jul 2004	Ong Ting Ting (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
17	PP v Tan Chee Wee: Murder, Self-Defense & Sudden Fight in Robbery 01 Oct 2003 Tan Chee Wee (Accused)Lost	01 Oct 2003	Tan Chee Wee (Accused): Accused ConvictedAccused convicted of murder and sentenced to death (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Rehana Perveen v Public Prosecutor: Grievous Hurt & Penal Code Interpretation 06 Jan 2002 Rehana Perveen (Appellant)Won	06 Jan 2002	Rehana Perveen (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against conviction allowed; Rehana Perveen acquitted of the charge.
19	Loo Weng Fatt v Public Prosecutor: Abetment by Conspiracy & Penal Code s 34 Complicity 17 Jul 2001 Loo Weng Fatt (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	17 Jul 2001	Loo Weng Fatt (Appellant, Respondent): Conviction alteredConviction under s 34 substituted with a conviction for abetment by conspiracy.
20	Loh Kim Lan v Public Prosecutor: Abetting Employment of Immigration Offender 02 Jan 2001 Golden Crystal Nightclub (Appellant)Lost	02 Jan 2001	Golden Crystal Nightclub (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction for employing an immigration offender was dismissed.