Public Prosecutor v Leong Soy Yip: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act

In Public Prosecutor v Leong Soy Yip and Yip Mun Hei, the High Court of Singapore convicted Leong Soy Yip and Yip Mun Hei on charges of trafficking diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act. The court found both accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt, leading to the imposition of the mandatory death sentence. Leong was found to be in possession of not less than 18.43 grams of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking, and Yip was found to have delivered the diamorphine to Leong.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Both accused convicted on their respective charges; mandatory death sentence passed.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Leong Soy Yip and Yip Mun Hei were convicted of trafficking diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act, leading to mandatory death sentences.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyConvictionWon
Tan Kiat Pheng of Public Prosecutor
Samuel Chua of Public Prosecutor
Leong Soy YipDefendantIndividualConvictionLost
Yip Mun HeiDefendantIndividualConvictionLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. CNB officers received information that Yip would deliver heroin to Leong.
  2. Yip handed two plastic bags to Leong near Block 413 Ang Mo Kio Avenue 10.
  3. Leong was found with 31 small packets containing not less than 18.43 grams of diamorphine.
  4. Yip's car was found to contain several Da Wang Bao packets containing white granular substance.
  5. Leong admitted to selling heroin and receiving drug supplies from a Malaysian syndicate.
  6. Yip admitted to working as a drug courier and delivering drugs to Leong on multiple occasions.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Leong Soy Yip and Another, CC 12/2009, [2009] SGHC 221

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Leong Soy Yip and Yip Mun Hei arrested for drug trafficking.
Judgment delivered by the High Court.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Drug Trafficking
    • Outcome: The court found both accused guilty of drug trafficking.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Presumption of Knowledge
    • Outcome: The court applied the presumption that the accused knew the packets contained diamorphine.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2001] 3 SLR 534
  3. Presumption of Trafficking
    • Outcome: The court applied the presumption that Leong possessed the drugs for the purpose of trafficking.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2001] 3 SLR 534
  4. Wilful Blindness
    • Outcome: The court found that Yip's wilful blindness was equivalent to actual knowledge.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2008] 1 SLR 1

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Conviction
  2. Mandatory Death Sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Drug Trafficking

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation
  • Drug Offences

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Ramis A/L Muniandy v PPHigh CourtYes[2001] 3 SLR 534SingaporeCited regarding the presumption of possession for the purpose of trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act.
Tan Kiam Peng v PPHigh CourtYes[2008] 1 SLR 1SingaporeCited regarding wilful blindness being equivalent to actual knowledge in drug trafficking cases.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 1985 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Drug Trafficking
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • CNB
  • Da Wang Bao
  • Boogie BBQ
  • Malaysian Syndicate
  • Drug Courier
  • Wilful Blindness

15.2 Keywords

  • Drug Trafficking
  • Diamorphine
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Offences
  • Statutory Interpretation