Wong Meng Meng

Wong Meng Meng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in international arbitration act and international arbitration. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside of Award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
ICC Rules	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Meng Meng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wong Meng Meng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Partnership	5 cases	83% of cases	Luzon Hydro v Transfield: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Alleged Breach of Natural Justice(Sep 2004) Mitsui v Easton Graham Rush: Injunction Against Arbitrator & Court's Power(Feb 2004) Bajumi Wahab v Afro-Asia Shipping: Review of Taxation Order and Solicitor's Bill of Costs(Aug 2002)
WongPartnership	1 cases	17% of cases	Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP: False Claim, Solicitor's Duty, and Penal Code Interpretation(Dec 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wong Meng Meng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.8 parties avg	2.8	50%
Neutral	211.0 parties avg	11.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	210.8 parties avg	10.8
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wong Meng Meng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Neutral	2(33%)	33%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP: False Claim, Solicitor's Duty, and Penal Code Interpretation 03 Dec 2009 Law Society of Singapore (Other)Neutral	03 Dec 2009	Law Society of Singapore (Other): NeutralThe Law Society of Singapore was allowed to be represented before the court and make known the reasons for its concerns.
2	Luzon Hydro v Transfield: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Alleged Breach of Natural Justice 12 Sep 2004 Luzon Hydro Corp (Applicant)Lost	12 Sep 2004	Luzon Hydro Corp (Applicant): Motion dismissed with costsMotion to set aside the Third Partial Award was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Mitsui v Easton Graham Rush: Injunction Against Arbitrator & Court's Power 15 Feb 2004 Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Feb 2004	Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for an injunction was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Bajumi Wahab v Afro-Asia Shipping: Review of Taxation Order and Solicitor's Bill of Costs 13 Aug 2002 Tan family (Defendant)Lost	13 Aug 2002	Tan family (Defendant): Applications for review dismissedApplications for review of the taxation order were dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Bajumi Wahab v Afro-Asia Shipping: Valuation Dispute over Company Assets 08 May 2001 Tan Choo Pin (Defendant)Neutral	08 May 2001	Tan Choo Pin (Defendant): Fair value of assets determinedCourt determined the fair value of the Ssangyong shares, Afro-Asia Building, and the rubber plantation.
6	John Holland v Toyo Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitration Award under International Arbitration Act 13 Mar 2001 Toyo Engineering Corp (Japan) (Respondent)Won	13 Mar 2001	Toyo Engineering Corp (Japan) (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe motion to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed.