Wong Ping Siang

Wong Ping Siang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and limitation. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Ping Siang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wong Ping Siang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Yong Kheng Leong v Panweld Trading: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Misappropriation of Funds(Oct 2012) Panweld Trading v Yong Kheng Leong: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Limitation Act(Mar 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wong Ping Siang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wong Ping Siang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,747,918.40	873,959.202 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yong Kheng Leong v Panweld Trading: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Misappropriation of Funds 21 Oct 2012 Panweld Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	21 Oct 2012	Panweld Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for Panweld Trading Pte Ltd; Yong Kheng Leong liable for $873,959.20 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Panweld Trading v Yong Kheng Leong: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Limitation Act 18 Mar 2012 Panweld Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	18 Mar 2012	Panweld Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the Plaintiff against Mr. Yong for $873,959.20 and against Mdm Lim for $338,410 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).