Yeoh Jean Wern

Yeoh Jean Wern is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in injunctions and mareva injunctions. Their track record shows a 63.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated expertise across 43 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Scope of Works	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mechanical and Electrical Design	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Design Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fitness for Purpose Warranty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Obligation of confidentiality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Yeoh Jean Wern has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yeoh Jean Wern has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	5 cases	71% of cases	Global Switch v Arup: Design Contract Dispute over Data Center Cooling & Power(May 2019) Moh Tai Siang v Moh Tai Tong: Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust & Undue Influence Dispute(Dec 2018) Liberty Sky Investments v Goh Seng Heng: Mareva Injunction & Fraudulent Misrepresentation(Jul 2017)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order for Mistake, Breach, Frustration(Nov 2012)
Stamford Law Corporation	1 cases	14% of cases	Australian Property Group v H.A. & Chung: Director's Duties & Unpaid Share Capital(May 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeoh Jean Wern's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.9
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	311.6 parties avg	11.6	43%
Won	52.8 parties avg	2.8	71%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	115.0 parties avg	15.0
2017	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeoh Jean Wern's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Won	5(63%)	63%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	22,715,724.69	3,785,954.126 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Global Switch v Arup: Design Contract Dispute over Data Center Cooling & Power 09 May 2019 Arup Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	09 May 2019	Arup Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaims AllowedCounterclaims for a total of $71,347.60 under SCN003(a), SCN003(b), SCN005, SCN006 and SCN007 were allowed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Moh Tai Siang v Moh Tai Tong: Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust & Undue Influence Dispute 30 Dec 2018 Royston Moh Tai Suan (Defendant)Won	30 Dec 2018	Royston Moh Tai Suan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the second defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	Liberty Sky Investments v Goh Seng Heng: Mareva Injunction & Fraudulent Misrepresentation 27 Jul 2017 Goh Ming Li Michelle (Respondent)Won	27 Jul 2017	Goh Ming Li Michelle (Respondent): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for a freezing injunction in respect of Michelle was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Wee Shuo Woon v HT S.R.L.: Legal Professional Privilege & Confidentiality after Data Breach 29 Mar 2017 HT SRL (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	29 Mar 2017	HT SRL (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; Wee to pay HT costs of $28,000 (inclusive of reasonable disbursements) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Goh Seng Heng v RSP Investments: Injunctions & Shareholder Power Struggle 11 Dec 2016 Quikglow Pte Ltd (formerly known as Dr Michelle Goh Pte Ltd) (Defendant)Lost	11 Dec 2016	Quikglow Pte Ltd (formerly known as Dr Michelle Goh Pte Ltd) (Defendant): Injunction GrantedThe AM group's applications for a Mareva injunction and a Springboard injunction were granted.
6	Australian Property Group v H.A. & Chung: Director's Duties & Unpaid Share Capital 28 May 2015 Australian Property Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 May 2015	Australian Property Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against the defendants. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order for Mistake, Breach, Frustration 11 Nov 2012 Teo Tian Seng (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Nov 2012	Teo Tian Seng (Plaintiff): Action dismissedThe plaintiff's action to set aside the Consent Order was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).