Yew Woon Chooi

Yew Woon Chooi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and trademark infringement. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Yew Woon Chooi has demonstrated expertise across 6 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trademarks and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trademarks	3 cases	30% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Yew Woon Chooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 30% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	20% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Yew Woon Chooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yew Woon Chooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Yew Woon Chooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Yew Woon Chooi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Yew Woon Chooi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Yew Woon Chooi has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Global Tobacco v Jamal: Trade Mark Invalidity for Cigarette Products(Sep 2015) Al Mahamid v Global Tobacco: Trade Mark Invalidation for Cigarette Brand 'Manchester'(Feb 2015) Love & Co v The Carat Club: Trade Mark Invalidity & Revocation for 'LOVE'(Sep 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yew Woon Chooi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yew Woon Chooi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Global Tobacco v Jamal: Trade Mark Invalidity for Cigarette Products 28 Sep 2015 Jamal Abdulnaser Mahmoud Al Mahamid (Respondent)Won	28 Sep 2015	Jamal Abdulnaser Mahmoud Al Mahamid (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent; costs of the appeal and proceedings below to be taxed if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Al Mahamid v Global Tobacco: Trade Mark Invalidation for Cigarette Brand 'Manchester' 10 Feb 2015 Jamal Abdulnaser Mahmoud Al Mahamid (Plaintiff)Won	10 Feb 2015	Jamal Abdulnaser Mahmoud Al Mahamid (Plaintiff): Trade Mark Invalidation GrantedTrade Mark No. T1208253B for “Manchester and M device” registered in Class 34 in the name of the Defendant is declared invalid under s 23(3)(a)(i) read with s 8(2)(b) of the Act. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Love & Co v The Carat Club: Trade Mark Invalidity & Revocation for 'LOVE' 21 Sep 2008 The Carat Club Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	21 Sep 2008	The Carat Club Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendant's simple “LOVE” mark declared invalid and revoked (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).