Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim

Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 15.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated expertise across 57 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and misrepresentation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice21% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligent misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Standard of Proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumptions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Margin Loan Facility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan-to-Value Ratio	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Margin Ratio	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Force Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moratorium Application	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bought-Sold Note	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual discretions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver of objections	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	11 cases	92% of cases	Siddiqsons Tin Plate Ltd v New Metallurgy Hi-Tech Group Co Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Oct 2024) DBO v DBP: Appeal Dismissed in Loan Repayment Dispute Arising from COVID-19 Pandemic(Jun 2024) Wong Ben v The WatchFund Ltd: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Luxury Watch Investment Scheme(Apr 2024)
Rodyk & Davidson	1 cases	8% of cases	Lau Yu Man v Wellmix Organics: Winding Up Order for Failure to Comply with Companies Act(Dec 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 2 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	94.8 parties avg	4.8	75%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	24.5 parties avg	4.5	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	37.4 parties avg	7.4

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Zhulkarnain bin Abdul Rahim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(69%)	69%
Partial	2(15%)	15%
Won	2(15%)	15%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	423,442.65	84,688.535 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2024	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Siddiqsons Tin Plate Ltd v New Metallurgy Hi-Tech Group Co Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 24 Oct 2024 Siddiqsons Tin Plate Ltd (Applicant)Lost	24 Oct 2024	Siddiqsons Tin Plate Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the Award was dismissed and Siddiqsons was ordered to pay costs of $35,000 to New Metallurgy (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	DBO v DBP: Appeal Dismissed in Loan Repayment Dispute Arising from COVID-19 Pandemic 23 Jun 2024 DBU (Appellant)Lost	23 Jun 2024	DBU (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Appellants to pay the Respondents’ costs of this appeal, assessed at S$100,000 to be paid within 14 days (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Wong Ben v The WatchFund Ltd: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Luxury Watch Investment Scheme 29 Apr 2024 Dominic Khoo Kong Weng (Defendant)Won	29 Apr 2024	Dominic Khoo Kong Weng (Defendant): Claims dismissedClaims for misrepresentation and lifting the corporate veil dismissed.
4	Asian Eco Technology v Deng Yiming: Striking Out Pleadings & Abuse of Process 13 Sep 2023 Deng Yiming (Defendant)Lost	13 Sep 2023	Deng Yiming (Defendant): Application granted againstApplication to expunge the Offending Materials granted, save for paragraph 5 of Deng’s Defence.
5	X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd v Metech International Ltd: Judicial Management Order Application 07 Sep 2023 X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	07 Sep 2023	X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application for judicial management order allowedThe court allowed the applicant's application for a judicial management order.
6	Asian Eco Technology v Deng Yiming: Summary Judgment for Diamond Seed and Loose Diamond Recovery 16 Aug 2023 Deng Yiming (Defendant)Lost	16 Aug 2023	Deng Yiming (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; ordered to pay damages to be assessed and costs and disbursements.
7	X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd v Metech International Ltd: Striking Out Scandalous Affidavit Evidence in Judicial Management Application 25 Jul 2023 X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	25 Jul 2023	X Diamond Capital Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application to expunge documents allowedThe court allowed the non-party's application to expunge documents from the applicant's affidavit.
8	Tan Chin Hock v Teo Cher Koon: Contract Formation & Evidence in Share Trading Dispute 05 Apr 2022 Tan Chin Hock (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	05 Apr 2022	Tan Chin Hock (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part by setting aside the Judgment which ordered him to pay the Sum to TTC with interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Comfort Management v OGSP Engineering: Costs Allocation After Breach of Contract Dispute 05 Apr 2022 COMFORT MANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	05 Apr 2022	COMFORT MANAGEMENT PTE LTD (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $388,442.65 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) and costs of $151,805.95. The plaintiff was deprived of 50% of its costs.
10	Tan Chin Hock v Teo Cher Koon: Contract Formation and Misrepresentation in ISDN Share Investment Dispute 11 Jul 2021 Tan Chin Hock (Plaintiff, Defendant)Lost	11 Jul 2021	Tan Chin Hock (Plaintiff, Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court dismissed Tan Chin Hock's claim in Suit 743.
11	Judah Value Activist Fund v Open Faith Investment Ltd: Breach of Contract & Causation in Share Transfer Agreement 01 Jul 2021 Judah Value Activist Fund (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Jul 2021	Judah Value Activist Fund (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for damages was rejected by the court.
12	Lau Yu Man v Wellmix Organics: Winding Up Order for Failure to Comply with Companies Act 27 Dec 2007 Wellmix Organics (International) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Dec 2007	Wellmix Organics (International) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding Up OrderThe company was ordered to be wound up under s 254(1)(c) of the Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed).