AE
AE is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
AE has been represented by 1 law firm and 2 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
David Rasif and Partners | 3 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of AE's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
Won | 22.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2005 | 12.0 parties avg |
2004 | 12.0 parties avg |
2003 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of AE's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(33.3%) |
Won | 2(66.7%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2005 | 1 1 |
2004 | 1 1 |
2003 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
03 Feb 2005 | Respondent | WonCustody orders for the daughters to the respondent were upheld. Access to the son was reduced. |
06 Apr 2004 | Respondent | LostThe court held that no extension of time should be granted to the wife to enable her to serve the notice of appeal out of time. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
21 Oct 2003 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe wife was granted an extension of time to serve the Notice of Appeal. |