Anil Singh Gurm

Anil Singh Gurm is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Anil Singh Gurm has been represented by 2 law firms and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Withers KhattarWong LLP	1 case	Jonathan Tan Deborah Barker Harpal Singh Deborah Evaline Barker Ushan Premaratne
KhattarWong LLP	1 case	Ushan Premaratne Deborah Barker SC

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anil Singh Gurm's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	66.7%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anil Singh Gurm's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,000.00	6,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2020-sghc-151 21 Jul 2020	21 Jul 2020	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed in its entirety.
2	2020-sgca-5 06 Feb 2020	06 Feb 2020	Appellant	WonThe appeal was allowed, granting the appellant leave to adduce Mr Sekhon’s testimony in Suit 580 via video link.
3	2018-sghc-221 04 Oct 2018	04 Oct 2018	Plaintiff	LostApplication for witness to give evidence by video link was dismissed with costs of $6,000 to be paid to the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).