Aparna Nargolwala

Aparna Nargolwala is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Aparna Nargolwala has been represented by 1 law firm and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Allen & Gledhill LLP	4 cases	Edmond Lim Tian Zhong Natalie Ng Ramesh Kumar s/o Ramasamy Lim Min Li Amanda Tan Shu-Ning Alyssa Alyssa Tan Shu-Ning Amanda Lim Min Li Ramesh Kumar

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Aparna Nargolwala's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 6 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	16.7%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	16.7%
Won	45.0 parties avg	5.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Aparna Nargolwala's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(16.7%)	16.7%
Neutral	1(16.7%)	16.7%
Won	4(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	392,340.78	78,468.165 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	2 12	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghci-12 25 Aug 2022	25 Aug 2022	Defendant	WonPlaintiffs to pay the defendants S$392,340.78 inclusive of GST and disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2022-sghci-7 24 Apr 2022	24 Apr 2022	Defendant	NeutralThe defendants' application for indemnity costs was refused. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2022-sghci-4 20 Feb 2022	20 Feb 2022	Defendant	WonJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2021-sgcai-1 09 Feb 2021	09 Feb 2021	Respondent, Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; Lew ordered to pay costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2020-sghci-24 23 Nov 2020	23 Nov 2020	Defendant	LostThe defendant's application for security of costs was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the jurisdiction's primary currency (SGD) is assumed.
6	2020-sghci-2 04 Feb 2020	04 Feb 2020	Defendant	WonThe action against the defendant was dismissed as the court found no binding oral contract existed.