APL Co Pte Ltd

APL Co Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 20.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

APL Co Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 case	Ang Hui Ming Vivian Douglas Lok Bao Guang
Ang & Partners	2 cases	Loo Dip Seng Gan Seng Chee Goh Seng Chee
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Kendall Tan Daphne Chua

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of APL Co Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40.0%
Neutral	18.0 parties avg	8.0	20.0%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of APL Co Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40.0%)	40.0%
Neutral	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Won	2(40.0%)	40.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2020-sghc-72 13 Apr 2020	13 Apr 2020	Defendant	NeutralDid not contest the Plaintiffs’ entitlement to limit liability and constitute a limitation fund.
2	2014-sghcr-17 14 Aug 2014	14 Aug 2014	Defendant	WonSUM 1620, the Plaintiff's application for stay for lis alibi pendens, was dismissed. SUM 2325, the Defendants’ application for the Court to order the Plaintiff to elect which jurisdiction it wished to proceed under the doctrine of forum election and for the proceedings in the other jurisdiction to be discontinued, was allowed with amendments.
3	2002-sgca-41 02 Oct 2002	02 Oct 2002	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed with costs. Security for costs paid out to the respondent's solicitors (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2002-sghc-81 22 Apr 2002	22 Apr 2002	Defendants, Appellants	LostAppeal dismissed; APL was found liable for delivering the cargo without production of the original bill of lading (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2000-sghc-252 26 Nov 2000	26 Nov 2000	Defendant, Respondent	WonDefendants' application to strike out the plaintiffs' statement of claim was successful. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.