Aref Holdings Limited
Aref Holdings Limited is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 14.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Aref Holdings Limited has been represented by 1 law firm and 2 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Withers KhattarWong LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Aref Holdings Limited's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 8.1
- Complex Cases
- 7 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 28.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 48.0 parties avg |
Won | 19.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2023 | 27.0 parties avg |
2021 | 19.0 parties avg |
2020 | 29.0 parties avg |
2019 | 18.0 parties avg |
2018 | 18.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Aref Holdings Limited's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(28.6%) |
Neutral | 4(57.1%) |
Won | 1(14.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.002 cases |
USD | 64,826,992.163 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2023 | 2 11 |
2021 | 1 1 |
2020 | 2 11 |
2019 | 1 1 |
2018 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
21 Nov 2023 | Defendant | NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party in the judgment. |
15 Jun 2023 | Defendant | LostClaim allowed against the defendant; damages to be paid in the amount of $124,474,854.00 (USD). |
25 Mar 2021 | Respondent | LostThe first to seventh respondents were ordered to be jointly and severally liable to the appellant for the total sum of US$70,006,122.49 and S$131,817.80. Assumed USD as the judgment refers to USD amounts. |
31 May 2020 | Respondent | NeutralNo Mareva injunction. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 Feb 2020 | Defendant | WonJudgment for the Defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore. |
31 Jan 2019 | Defendant | NeutralNo specific outcome for this party is mentioned in the judgment extract. |
22 Feb 2018 | Defendant | NeutralThe fourth to seventh defendants are not involved in any of the four applications before me. |