ATS

ATS is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 3 law firms.

Legal Representation

ATS has been represented by 3 law firms and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	2 cases	Koh Tien Hua Lim Sok Hui Gina
A Alagappan Law Corporation	1 case	Alagappan Arunasalam
M/s A Alagappan Law Corporation	1 case	Alagappan Arunasalam

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of ATS's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of ATS's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Partial	3(75.0%)	75.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,954.10	6,984.703 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sghc-196 14 Sep 2016	14 Sep 2016	Plaintiff	PartialThe application to vary the maintenance order was dismissed save for a prayer concerning an insurance policy.
2	2013-sghc-156 19 Aug 2013	19 Aug 2013	Plaintiff, Respondent	PartialWife's application for her share of the rental collected from the MMM property was allowed in the amount of $12,554.10 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2012-sgca-22 02 Apr 2012	02 Apr 2012	Respondent	LostThe wife's share of the three immovable properties as ordered by the Judge was excessive and should be reduced.
4	2011-sghc-213 21 Sep 2011	21 Sep 2011	Plaintiff	PartialThe Husband is to pay the Wife a sum of $8,400 a month as maintenance for herself and the Children. The breakdown of this sum is $2,500 for the Wife’s personal expenses, $900 for the Children’s personal expenses and $5,000 for the household expenses. In addition, the Husband shall pay the Wife, and not on a reimbursement basis, the Children’s expenses relating to their education, insurance policies and weekly pocket money. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.