Chee Siok Chin

Chee Siok Chin is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 1 counsel. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 12.5% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 75.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Chee Siok Chin has been represented by 1 law firm and 1 counsel.

Law FirmCases Handled
M Ravi & Co4 cases

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chee Siok Chin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
6.0
Complex Cases
6 (75.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost76.4 parties avg
Won13.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201217.0 parties avg
201128.0 parties avg
2007110.0 parties avg
200643.8 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chee Siok Chin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost7(87.5%)
Won1(12.5%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD237.504 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20121
1
20111
2
20071
1
20062
31

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
20 May 2012
AppellantLostAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. Fined $950 in default 6 days’ imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21 Feb 2011
AppellantLostAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
21 Feb 2011
AppellantLostAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
05 Nov 2007
Defendant, AppellantLostThe applications for extension of time to file appeals and waiver of security deposit were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30 Nov 2006
DefendantLostInterlocutory judgment entered against the defendant with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12 Sep 2006
PlaintiffLostOriginating Summons dismissed with costs to be taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
02 Aug 2006
ApplicantWonApplication for judge to recuse himself was granted.
21 Jun 2006
PlaintiffLostPlaintiff's application to declare the results of the General Elections 2006 null and void was dismissed due to failure to provide security for costs. Costs of the application are to be taxed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).