Chia Kin Tuck

Chia Kin Tuck is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 40.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Chia Kin Tuck has been represented by 3 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Harry Elias Partnership	4 cases	Koh Tien Hua Michelle Elias
Sam & Wijaya	1 case	Sivanathan Wijaya Ravana
J P Liaw and Co	1 case	Liaw Jin Poh

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chia Kin Tuck's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 2 (40.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	60.0%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20.0%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	33.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chia Kin Tuck's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60.0%)	60.0%
Partial	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Won	1(20.0%)	20.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,538,858.80	846,286.273 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 21	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2008-sghc-75 20 May 2008	20 May 2008	Plaintiff	WonThe plaintiff's application for the fourth defendant to withdraw her caveat was granted.
2	2006-sghc-87 24 May 2006	24 May 2006	Defendant, Appellant	LostAppeal against the decision of the assistant registrar was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	2005-sghc-73 18 Apr 2005	18 Apr 2005	Respondent, Appellant	LostThe husband's appeal against the division of matrimonial assets was dismissed in part, requiring him to pay the wife a share of the property, cash assets, and reimbursement for rent. The total amount payable to the wife was $1,538,858.80 (Singapore Dollars).
4	2005-sghc-41 27 Feb 2005	27 Feb 2005	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claims that the Ringwood and Balestier properties were held in trust for the estate of Chong Siew Kum were dismissed.
5	2005-sghc-1 03 Jan 2005	03 Jan 2005	Plaintiff, Appellant	PartialAppeals dismissed; judgment varied to order the second defendant to return $1 million with interest to the plaintiff's solicitors, pending resolution of beneficial ownership. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.