Ching Mun Fong

Ching Mun Fong is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Ching Mun Fong has been represented by 3 law firms and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Damodara Hazra LLP	1 case	Suresh s/o Damodara Suresh Damodara
Donaldson & Burkinshaw	1 case	Jimmy Yap Josephine Low Michael Khoo, SC
Michael Khoo & Partners	1 case	Josephine Low Michael Khoo

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ching Mun Fong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ching Mun Fong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75.0%)	75.0%
Won	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,500.00	2,250.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2012-sgca-38 25 Jul 2012	25 Jul 2012	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed with costs.
2	2012-sghc-5 08 Jan 2012	08 Jan 2012	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed; costs of $4,500 awarded to the defendant on an indemnity basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2001-sgca-36 08 May 2001	08 May 2001	Appellant	LostThe appeal was dismissed.
4	2000-sgca-1 11 Jan 2000	11 Jan 2000	Appellant	WonThe appellant's appeal against the decision to strike out the statement of claim and disallow amendments was allowed.