Chuang Hern Hsiung
Chuang Hern Hsiung is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Chuang Hern Hsiung has been represented by 2 law firms and 5 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Rodyk & Davidson LLP | 1 case |
Wong Tan & Molly Lim LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Chuang Hern Hsiung's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.7
- Complex Cases
- 1 (33.3%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 24.0 parties avg |
Partial | 13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2011 | 13.0 parties avg |
2010 | 13.0 parties avg |
2008 | 15.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Chuang Hern Hsiung's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(66.7%) |
Partial | 1(33.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 796,669.922 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2011 | 1 1 |
2010 | 1 1 |
2008 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
10 Jul 2011 | Defendant, Appellant | PartialAppeal dismissed in part. The court affirmed part of the Assistant Registrar's award. |
11 Oct 2010 | Defendant | LostDamages assessed against the defendant in the amount of S$1,593,339.83 (Singapore Dollars), comprising S$62,710.30 for TecBiz Frisman Pte Ltd fees, S$99,306.09 for Fourwin Co. Ltd fees, S$4,759.57 for Fourwin Co. Ltd disbursements, S$295,003.43 for Chio Lim & Associates fees, S$813,530 for loss of revenue/profit, and S$318,080.44 for loss from overstocking mahi mahi. |
17 Aug 2008 | Defendant | LostFound liable for breach of contractual and fiduciary duties, conspiracy to injure and unlawful interference in the plaintiff’s business. Damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |