Lok Vi Ming

Lok Vi Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 81 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and construction law. Their track record shows a 36.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 26 complex cases, representing 32% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated expertise across 233 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	60 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 60 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	23 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 23 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	18 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	18 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 18 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	16 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	11 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	11 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	10 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	9 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	9 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	8 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	7 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Aviation Law	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Transportation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Liability	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Carriage by Air	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letters of Indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charity Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Innocent Misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pyramid Schemes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Emergency Interim Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Emergency Arbitrator	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Post-termination provisions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Presumptions against gifts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lending and security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lis alibi pendens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Party Autonomy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sub-contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Discipline	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Property	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building Plans	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Schemes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ponzi Scheme	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wasted Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pyramid Scheme	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Compensation for delays	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ground for termination of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
IVF Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Birth	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assisted Reproduction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Product Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Education Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sponsorship Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Special Purpose Vehicle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commingling of bank accounts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sovereign Immunity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Carriage of Goods by Air and Land	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceuticals Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law Corporations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accident Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Products Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Treaties and Conventions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Air Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Air Crash Investigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Aircraft Accident	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warsaw Convention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restoration to roll of advocates and solicitors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Probate and Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adoptions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Aviation Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hospital Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ponzi Schemes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Apparent bias	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign arbitral award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
No Oral Modification Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reasonable Skill and Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Defraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recusal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Counter-restitution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lok Vi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lok Vi Ming has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 27 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
LVM Law Chambers LLC	27 cases	33% of cases	Swire Shipping v Ace Exim: Setting Aside Arbitral Award - Jurisdiction, Natural Justice, Customary Waiting Place(Aug 2024) Lin Haifeng v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application and Judge Recusal(Jan 2024) Shree Ramkrishna Exports v JG Jewelry: Joint Venture Dispute & Director's Duties(Jan 2024)
Rodyk & Davidson	23 cases	28% of cases	Children's Media Ltd v Singapore Tourism Board: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Lifting the Corporate Veil(Nov 2008) Hanson v Tan: Dependency Claim Assessment After Fatal Accident(Nov 2007) Ng Chin Siau v How Kim Chuan: Appeal Against Arbitration Award on Partnership Valuation(Mar 2007)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	21 cases	26% of cases	Clearlab SG Pte Ltd v Ma Zhi: Appeal on Costs Order Requires Leave(May 2016) Clearlab v Ting Chong Chai: Costs for Breach of Confidence Claim(Oct 2015) Newcon Builders v Sino New Steel: Premature Adjudication Application under SOPA(Sep 2015)
Rodyk and Davidson	7 cases	9% of cases	Lim Swee Khiang v Borden Co: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Company Affairs(Jul 2005) Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent(Dec 2004) Ang Ming Chuang v Singapore Airlines: Forum Non Conveniens & Lis Alibi Pendens in Air Accident Claim(Nov 2004)
LVM Chambers LLC	1 cases	1% of cases	Lyu Jun v Wei Ho-Hung: Resulting Trusts, Gifts, and Intention to Create Legal Relations(Nov 2021)
LVM Law Chambers	1 cases	1% of cases	PP v Lin Haifeng: Corruption & Falsification by Senior Project Manager in COCC Project(Jun 2024)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	1% of cases	TXW v TXX: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings(Feb 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lok Vi Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 26 (32%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	37.0 parties avg	7.0	4%
Lost	344.7 parties avg	4.7	42%
Neutral	33.0 parties avg	3.0	4%
Partial	124.0 parties avg	4.0	15%
Withdrawn	14.0 parties avg	4.0	1%
Won	303.2 parties avg	3.2	37%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	53.4 parties avg	3.4
2001	72.4 parties avg	2.4
2002	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2004	63.3 parties avg	3.3
2005	112.0 parties avg	12.0
2006	37.0 parties avg	7.0
2007	38.8 parties avg	8.8
2008	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	32.8 parties avg	2.8
2011	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2015	35.3 parties avg	5.3
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	34.5 parties avg	4.5
2019	63.1 parties avg	3.1
2020	63.2 parties avg	3.2
2021	54.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2023	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2024	46.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lok Vi Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	3(4%)	4%
Lost	34(41%)	41%
Neutral	3(4%)	4%
Partial	12(14%)	14%
Withdrawn	1(1%)	1%
Won	30(36%)	36%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
AUD	518,032.89	518,032.891 cases	1
SGD	27,392,053.08	547,841.0650 cases	50

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2001	7 214	Neutral: 2 cases (28.6%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 4 cases (57.1%)
2002	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2003	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	6 1113	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (16.7%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 3 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2007	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2008	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2011	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2015	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2019	7 142	Dismissed: 1 cases (14.3%) Lost: 4 cases (57.1%) Won: 2 cases (28.6%)
2020	6 213	Lost: 2 cases (33.3%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 3 cases (50.0%)
2021	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2024	5 131	Dismissed: 1 cases (20.0%) Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 81 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Swire Shipping v Ace Exim: Setting Aside Arbitral Award - Jurisdiction, Natural Justice, Customary Waiting Place 15 Aug 2024 Swire Shipping Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	15 Aug 2024	Swire Shipping Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedSwire Shipping's application to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay costs of $17,000 to Ace Exim (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	PP v Lin Haifeng: Corruption & Falsification by Senior Project Manager in COCC Project 30 Jun 2024 Lin Haifeng (Respondent)Lost	30 Jun 2024	Lin Haifeng (Respondent): ConvictedThe Accused was convicted of nine charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act and nine charges under the Penal Code, sentenced to 21 weeks' imprisonment and a fine of $9,000 (SGD), with an in-default sentence of nine weeks' imprisonment. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	Lin Haifeng v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application and Judge Recusal 31 Jan 2024 Lin Haifeng (Applicant)Lost	31 Jan 2024	Lin Haifeng (Applicant): Application for recusal dismissedThe applicant's application for the judge to recuse himself from hearing the s 394H Application was dismissed.
4	Shree Ramkrishna Exports v JG Jewelry: Joint Venture Dispute & Director's Duties 17 Jan 2024 Shaileshkumar Manubhai Khunt (Plaintiff, Defendant)Partial	17 Jan 2024	Shaileshkumar Manubhai Khunt (Plaintiff, Defendant): Judgment for Plaintiff in partAn order that the Kriss Brothers are to do all that is necessary to effect a restatement of the 2016 FS, 2017 FS and 2018 FS such that the Accounts Payable Adjustment, SRK Payable Adjustment and Capital Repayment Adjustment are removed, and the Kriss Brothers are to re-submit the restated financial statements to the auditors for an audit to be done, and the audited accounts are to be filed with the relevant authorities.
5	Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd v Debtor: Assignment, Set-Off & Insolvency 23 Nov 2023 Debtor (Respondent)Partial	23 Nov 2023	Debtor (Respondent): Insolvency set-off allowedInsolvency set-off did take effect immediately prior to the commencement of the winding up of the Company on 12 July 2021.
6	COT v COU: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Jurisdiction and Breach of Natural Justice 10 Oct 2023 COW (Appellant, Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	10 Oct 2023	COW (Appellant, Defendant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $70,000 awarded to the first respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Conspiracy, Misrepresentation in Ponzi Scheme 13 Apr 2023 Chan Pik Sun (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Apr 2023	Chan Pik Sun (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedAll claims against all defendants were dismissed.
8	Kwek Hong Lim v Kwek Sum Chuan: Oral Contract Dispute over Supermarket Shares and Property 22 Mar 2023 Kwek Sum Chuan (Defendant)Won	22 Mar 2023	Kwek Sum Chuan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim against the defendant.
9	Lim Lai Soon v Tan Hong Sin: Beneficial Ownership of Shares & Patents Dispute 17 Nov 2022 Lim Lai Soon (Plaintiff)Won	17 Nov 2022	Lim Lai Soon (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPlaintiff's claim for beneficial ownership of shares was substantially successful.
10	CVG v CVH: Enforcement of Emergency Interim Award and Interpretation of International Arbitration Act 06 Oct 2022 CVH (Defendant)Won	06 Oct 2022	CVH (Defendant): Application GrantedDefendant's application to set aside the Enforcement Order was granted, and the claimant was ordered to pay costs to the defendant fixed at $16,000 plus disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Lyu Jun v Wei Ho-Hung: Resulting Trusts, Gifts, and Intention to Create Legal Relations 25 Nov 2021 Lyu Jun (Plaintiff)Partial	25 Nov 2021	Lyu Jun (Plaintiff): Beneficial ownership declaredBeneficially owns 100% of the D’Leedon apartment and the Car, and 80% of the Marne Road shop.
12	Oxley Consortium v Geetex Enterprises: Interpretation of Standard Form Contract under Sale of Commercial Properties Act 27 Jul 2021 Geetex Enterprises Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	27 Jul 2021	Geetex Enterprises Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal dismissed in part; the court answered the first four questions of law in favor of the respondent. The respondent is entitled to a refund of progress payments for Unit 1 and Unit 2 as claimed in the schedule to the award, together with the prescribed interest.
13	Lim Teng Siang v Hong Choon Hau: Oral Rescission & No Oral Modification Clause in Share Purchase Agreement 21 Apr 2021 Tay Mui Koon (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	21 Apr 2021	Tay Mui Koon (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $35,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Crest Capital Asia v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Conspiracy & Breach of Fiduciary Duty 29 Mar 2021 Fan Kow Hin (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	29 Mar 2021	Fan Kow Hin (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; liable for damages and costs.
15	CIMB Bank v World Fuel Services: Debenture Authenticity & Right of Set-Off Dispute 04 Mar 2021 CIMB Bank Berhad (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	04 Mar 2021	CIMB Bank Berhad (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; CIMB to pay WFS costs of $32,000 for both appeals (CA 107/2020 and CA 130/2020). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Terrence Fernandez v Genevieve Lim: Defamation, Conspiracy, and Harassment Suit 29 Dec 2020 Serangoon Gardens Country Club (Third Party)Withdrawn	29 Dec 2020	Serangoon Gardens Country Club (Third Party): Claim WithdrawnThe claim and counterclaim against Goh Juak Kin were discontinued.
17	MS First Capital Insurance v Smart Automobile: Breach of Contract & Contractual Terms Dispute 19 Nov 2020 MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	19 Nov 2020	MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court declared that the sum of S$500,000 paid by the defendant to the plaintiff in September 2013 was paid towards the Burning Cost Premium under the Policy, and that the defendant is accordingly not entitled to any refund of that amount. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Oxley Consortium v Geetex: Recourse Against Award & Appeal Under Arbitration Act 04 Nov 2020 Geetex Enterprises Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	04 Nov 2020	Geetex Enterprises Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Sandy Island Pte Ltd v Thio Keng Thay: Damages for Defects in Construction Contract 27 Aug 2020 Sandy Island Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	27 Aug 2020	Sandy Island Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay respondent costs for the appeal fixed at $50,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Mareva Injunction in Investment Scheme Dispute 02 Jul 2020 Chan Pik Sun (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Jul 2020	Chan Pik Sun (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application for a Mareva injunction was dismissed.
21	Liberty Sky Investments v Aesthetic Medical Partners: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission 09 Feb 2020 Dr Goh Seng Heng (Defendant, Respondent, Appellant)Won	09 Feb 2020	Dr Goh Seng Heng (Defendant, Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. No monetary amount awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Wang Xiaopu v Goh Seng Heng: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Share Purchase Agreements 04 Dec 2019 Goh Ming Li Michelle (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	04 Dec 2019	Goh Ming Li Michelle (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Claim DismissedWang has not made out her claim against Michelle for misrepresentations in respect of the 1st MOU (as amended). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	BSM v BSN: Setting Aside Arbitral Awards for Breach of Natural Justice & Failure to Present Case 12 Aug 2019 BSN (Respondent)Won	12 Aug 2019	BSN (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentBSM was ordered to pay the Companies’ costs in the sum of $28,000, inclusive of disbursements for both OS 747 and 748. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Wan Hoe Keet v LVM Law Chambers LLC: Conflict of Interest and Injunction in Legal Representation 22 Apr 2019 LVM Law Chambers LLC (Respondent)Lost	22 Apr 2019	LVM Law Chambers LLC (Respondent): Injunction grantedLVM Law Chambers LLC was enjoined from acting for Chan Pik Sun in Suit 806.
25	OCBC v. Yeo Hui Keng: Non Est Factum & All-Moneys Mortgage Dispute 27 Feb 2019 Tan Peng Chin LLC (Third Party)Won	27 Feb 2019	Tan Peng Chin LLC (Third Party): Claim DismissedDefendant's claim against the Third Party was dismissed.
26	Liberty Sky Investments v Goh Seng Heng: Misrepresentation, Fraud, and Rescission 19 Feb 2019 Goh Ming Li Michelle @ Wu Mingli (Defendant)Dismissed	19 Feb 2019	Goh Ming Li Michelle @ Wu Mingli (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against Michelle dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Cai Mei Ying v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Negligent Cycling Resulting in Grievous Hurt 06 Feb 2019 Cai Mei Ying (Appellant)Lost	06 Feb 2019	Cai Mei Ying (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence of two weeks' imprisonment was dismissed.
28	CAA Technologies v Newcon Builders: Termination of Sub-Contract & Compensation for Delays in Construction Project 17 Sep 2017 Newcon Builders Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	17 Sep 2017	Newcon Builders Pte Ltd (Respondent): Partial WinThe court upheld the decision that Newcon was entitled to terminate the Sub-Contract as CAA’s breaches of clause 2 of the Letter of Intent had substantially deprived Newcon of the whole benefit of the Sub-Contract. However, the order for CAA to pay $407,000 to Newcon for liquidated damages paid to JTC was set aside.
29	Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Costs Allocation After Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims 24 Apr 2017 CHIK SAU KAM (Defendant)Lost	24 Apr 2017	CHIK SAU KAM (Defendant): LostLiable for 90% of the plaintiff’s costs, amounting to $540,000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
30	TXW v TXX: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings 23 Feb 2017 TXX (Defendant)Won	23 Feb 2017	TXX (Defendant): Division of Matrimonial AssetsThe Defendant received 65% of the matrimonial assets, amounting to $9,361,792.70 (65% of $14,402,758). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	Clearlab SG Pte Ltd v Ma Zhi: Appeal on Costs Order Requires Leave 19 May 2016 CLEARLAB SG PTE LTD (Appellant)Lost	19 May 2016	CLEARLAB SG PTE LTD (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the present appeal and the present summonses be fixed at $20,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	Clearlab v Ting Chong Chai: Costs for Breach of Confidence Claim 13 Oct 2015 CLEARLAB SG PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Oct 2015	CLEARLAB SG PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Claims dismissed against the sixth, seventh, and eighth defendantsThe plaintiff's claims against the sixth, seventh, and eighth defendants were dismissed.
33	Newcon Builders v Sino New Steel: Premature Adjudication Application under SOPA 20 Sep 2015 Newcon Builders Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	20 Sep 2015	Newcon Builders Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the Adjudication Determination was set aside. Orders made below, including the order for costs, were also set aside, with the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
34	Chin Ivan v H P Construction: Validity and Enforcement of Architect's Certificates in Construction Contract Dispute 11 Mar 2015 IVAN CHIN (Appellant, Defendant)Won	11 Mar 2015	IVAN CHIN (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs of $40,000. The proceedings were stayed in their entirety and the respondent’s claim referred to arbitration.
35	Lek Gwee Noi v Humming Flowers: Restrictive Covenant, Non-Competition, and Non-Solicitation 07 Apr 2014 Humming Flowers & Gifts Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	07 Apr 2014	Humming Flowers & Gifts Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the plaintiff. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
36	ACB v Thomson Medical: Negligence, Breach of Contract & IVF Error 24 Feb 2014 Others (Defendant)Lost	24 Feb 2014	Others (Defendant): Striking out application unsuccessfulThe defendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's claim for the upkeep of the child was unsuccessful, and the claim was directed to proceed to trial.
37	Yip Man Hing Kevin v Gleneagles Hospital: Judicial Review of Hospital's Disciplinary Decision 23 Jan 2014 Gleneagles Hospital (Respondent)Won	23 Jan 2014	Gleneagles Hospital (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for leave was dismissed and costs were awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
38	PP v Li Weiming: Criminal Case Disclosure, Intent to Defraud, Falsification of Accounts 22 Jan 2014 Li Weiming (Respondent)Partial	22 Jan 2014	Li Weiming (Respondent): Orders for particulars set asideThe court set aside the Judge’s orders that the PP provide the respondents with (a) the identity of the persons whom the respondents allegedly conspired to defraud and (b) the reasons why the subcontract between ZTE and Questzone was allegedly fictitious.
39	Li Weiming v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision on Prosecution's Discovery Obligations 26 Mar 2013 Li Weiming (Applicant)Partial	26 Mar 2013	Li Weiming (Applicant): Application for particulars granted in partApplication for particulars granted in part; further particulars ordered regarding the identity of the defrauded party and the fictitious sub-contract.
40	Lew Kiat Beng v Hiap Seng: Derivative Action & Discovery Obligations 20 Nov 2011 Hiap Seng & Co Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	20 Nov 2011	Hiap Seng & Co Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Appellants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
41	Chun Cheng Fishery v Chuang: Breach of Duty & Damages Assessment 10 Jul 2011 Chuang Hern Hsiung (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	10 Jul 2011	Chuang Hern Hsiung (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part. The court affirmed part of the Assistant Registrar's award.
42	Stansfield Group v Consumers’ Association: Tort, Contract & Suspension of CaseTrust Membership 17 May 2011 NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited (Defendant)Partial	17 May 2011	NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited (Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment to the first plaintiff for damages of $100 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
43	Chun Cheng Fishery v Chuang Hern Hsiung: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Damages Assessment 11 Oct 2010 Chuang Hsin-Yi (Defendant)Lost	11 Oct 2010	Chuang Hsin-Yi (Defendant): Damages AssessedDamages assessed against the defendant in the amount of S$1,593,339.83 (Singapore Dollars), comprising S$62,710.30 for TecBiz Frisman Pte Ltd fees, S$99,306.09 for Fourwin Co. Ltd fees, S$4,759.57 for Fourwin Co. Ltd disbursements, S$295,003.43 for Chio Lim & Associates fees, S$813,530 for loss of revenue/profit, and S$318,080.44 for loss from overstocking mahi mahi.
44	Singapore Tourism Board v Children’s Media Ltd: Quistclose Trust & Sponsorship Sum Refund 12 Aug 2010 Singapore Tourism Board (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	12 Aug 2010	Singapore Tourism Board (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; judgment entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $6,661,092.07, including sponsorship sums, wasted man-hour costs, and other payments. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
45	Lin Chao-Feng v Chuang Hsin-Yi: Dispute over Beneficial Ownership of Shares in Chun Cheng Fishery Enterprise Pte Ltd 16 Jun 2010 Chuang Hsin-Yi (Defendant)Won	16 Jun 2010	Chuang Hsin-Yi (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
46	Car & Cars v Volkswagen: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 18 Oct 2009 Car & Cars Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	18 Oct 2009	Car & Cars Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
47	K Solutions v NUS: Striking Out for Document Destruction & Discovery Obligations 15 Jun 2009 K Solutions Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	15 Jun 2009	K Solutions Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Claim DismissedK Solutions' claim for wrongful termination was dismissed.
48	Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport SDPR: Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgment 29 Dec 2008 The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (Also known as Jugoimport – SDPR) (Respondent)Lost	29 Dec 2008	The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (Also known as Jugoimport – SDPR) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
49	Children's Media Ltd v Singapore Tourism Board: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Lifting the Corporate Veil 13 Nov 2008 Singapore Tourism Board (Respondent)Won	13 Nov 2008	Singapore Tourism Board (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the appellants are liable to refund $6,155,250 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
50	Then Kwen Choy Kevin v VibroPower: Commission Dispute Over Diesel Generator Sales 23 Jun 2008 VibroPower Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	23 Jun 2008	VibroPower Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim against the defendant.
51	Singapore Tourism Board v Children's Media Ltd: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Corporate Veil Piercing 26 May 2008 Singapore Tourism Board (Plaintiff)Won	26 May 2008	Singapore Tourism Board (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment awarded to the plaintiff; damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
52	Hanson v Tan: Dependency Claim Assessment After Fatal Accident 27 Nov 2007 Eu Zai Feng Elliot (Plaintiff)Partial	27 Nov 2007	Eu Zai Feng Elliot (Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartDependency claim allowed in part; awarded A$518,032.89.
53	Ng Chin Siau v How Kim Chuan: Leave to Appeal Arbitration Award Refused 26 Sep 2007 How Kim Chuan (Applicant, Defendant)Lost	26 Sep 2007	How Kim Chuan (Applicant, Defendant): Application LostApplication for leave to appeal was dismissed.
54	Ng Chin Siau v How Kim Chuan: Appeal Against Arbitration Award on Partnership Valuation 05 Mar 2007 How Kim Chuan (Defendant)Lost	05 Mar 2007	How Kim Chuan (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal dismissed with costs. The court found no question of law of general importance or special reason to warrant an appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
55	Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport-SDPR: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment in Singapore 27 Nov 2006 Yugoimport-SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR) (Judgment Debtor)Won	27 Nov 2006	Yugoimport-SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR) (Judgment Debtor): Application to set aside registration grantedThe judgment debtor's application to set aside the registration of the judgment was granted.
56	Sun Technosystems v Federal Express: Bailment, Carrier Duties & Hijacking 07 Nov 2006 Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2006	Federal Express Services (M) Sdn Bhd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.
57	Lim Swee Khiang v Borden Co: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Company Act Remedies 24 Sep 2006 C H Lim Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	24 Sep 2006	C H Lim Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. The court found the respondents had acted in disregard of the appellants' interests as minority shareholders.
58	Lim Swee Khiang v Borden Co: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Company Affairs 31 Jul 2005 C.H. Lim Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	31 Jul 2005	C.H. Lim Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
59	Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent 02 Dec 2004 Projector SA (Appellant, Defendant)Won	02 Dec 2004	Projector SA (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; order made on 16 July 2004 by Woo J set aside. Leave granted to amend notice of appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
60	Ang Ming Chuang v Singapore Airlines: Forum Non Conveniens & Lis Alibi Pendens in Air Accident Claim 23 Nov 2004 Singapore Airlines Ltd (Defendant)Lost	23 Nov 2004	Singapore Airlines Ltd (Defendant): Stay of Singapore action grantedSingapore Airlines' Singapore action against the third party was stayed pending the outcome of SIA's Taiwan action.
61	Sumitomo v Salim: Applications to Adduce Further Evidence and File Single Case at Substantive Appeals 02 Sep 2004 Sumitomo Corp Capital Asia Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	02 Sep 2004	Sumitomo Corp Capital Asia Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Application granted in partApplication to file a single case and a single core bundle for the appeals was granted. Application to adduce additional evidence was adjourned to be heard before the full Court of Appeal.
62	Gnaguru s/o Thamboo Mylvaganam v Law Society: Application for Reinstatement to the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors 16 Aug 2004 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Neutral	16 Aug 2004	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): NeutralThe Law Society did not object to the application. No order as to costs was made.
63	Civil Aeronautics Administration v Singapore Airlines: Sovereign Immunity & State Recognition 13 Jan 2004 Singapore Airlines Ltd (Respondent)Won	13 Jan 2004	Singapore Airlines Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for Respondent; costs awarded. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
64	Engelin Teh Practice LLC v Wee Soon Kim Anthony: Enforceability of Costs Agreement After Law Firm Dissolution 11 Jan 2004 Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Respondent)Won	11 Jan 2004	Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Respondent): Summons dismissedThe court dismissed the summons brought against Mr. Wee.
65	De Cruz v Guangzhou: Slim 10, Director Liability & Negligence 02 Oct 2003 Rayson Tan Tai Ming (Defendant)Dismissed	02 Oct 2003	Rayson Tan Tai Ming (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff’s claim against the fifth defendant is dismissed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
66	Woo Anthony v Singapore Airlines: Sovereign Immunity and Recognition of Taiwan under State Immunity Act 27 Aug 2003 Singapore Airlines Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	27 Aug 2003	Singapore Airlines Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal by the third party, Civil Aeronautics Administration of Taiwan, was dismissed, meaning Singapore Airlines can continue its third party action against them.
67	China Airlines v Philips Hong Kong: Warsaw Convention & Liability for Lost Cargo 24 Jun 2002 China Airlines Ltd (Appellant)Lost	24 Jun 2002	China Airlines Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The security for costs, with any accrued interest, should be released to the respondents` solicitors to account of the respondents` costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
68	China Airlines v Philips Hong Kong: Warsaw Convention, Article 22 & Liability Limits for Damaged Air Cargo 24 Jun 2002 China Airlines Limited (Appellant)Lost	24 Jun 2002	China Airlines Limited (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
69	Clarke v SilkAir: Limitation of Liability for Passenger Deaths under Warsaw Convention 14 May 2002 SilkAir (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	14 May 2002	SilkAir (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent's position that it was entitled to limit its liability under the Conventions was upheld.
70	Clarke v SilkAir: Warsaw Convention, Air Crash Liability & Pilot Misconduct 23 Oct 2001 SilkAir (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	23 Oct 2001	SilkAir (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, SilkAir, dismissing the plaintiffs' claim and awarding costs to SilkAir.
71	Clarke v Silkair: Limitation of Liability for Air Crash Deaths under Warsaw Convention 23 Oct 2001 Silkair (Singapore) Private Limited (Defendant)Won	23 Oct 2001	Silkair (Singapore) Private Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe plaintiffs' claim against SilkAir was dismissed with costs.
72	Re Section 102 Legal Profession Act v Nirmal Singh: Professional Misconduct 05 Jul 2001 Law Society (Other)Neutral	05 Jul 2001	Law Society (Other): UnknownOutcome for the Law Society is not specified in the provided text.
73	Re Nirmal Singh: Application under Legal Profession Act - Disciplinary Proceedings 05 Jul 2001 Law Society (Respondent)Neutral	05 Jul 2001	Law Society (Respondent): No outcome provided in the text.No outcome provided in the text.
74	Re Nirmal Singh: Application for Restoration to Roll of Advocates and Solicitors after Corruption and Criminal Breach of Trust Convictions 05 Jul 2001 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	05 Jul 2001	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Objection UpheldThe Law Society objected to the application, and the court dismissed the application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
75	S3 Building Services v Sky Technology: Extension of Time for Filing AEICs Dispute 04 May 2001 Sky Technology Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	04 May 2001	Sky Technology Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, but Sky Technology Pte Ltd was ordered to pay costs of the appeal and of two applications below on a standard basis which was fixed at $14,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
76	Singapore Airlines v Fujitsu: Limitation of Liability under Warsaw Convention 04 Jan 2001 Singapore Airlines Ltd (Appellant)Won	04 Jan 2001	Singapore Airlines Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; entitled to the protection of the limitation of liability laid down by the Warsaw Convention, as amended by the Hague Protocol.
77	Singapore Airlines v Fujitsu: Warsaw Convention & Liability for Lost Cargo 29 Nov 2000 Malaysian Airlines System Bhd (Appellant)Won	29 Nov 2000	Malaysian Airlines System Bhd (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed.
78	Choong Wai Phwee v Chileon: Charity Trustees' Power of Sale & Specific Performance 25 Jul 2000 Choong Wai Phwee and Others (Trustees of Cheng Liam Um Vegetarian Temple) (Plaintiff)Won	25 Jul 2000	Choong Wai Phwee and Others (Trustees of Cheng Liam Um Vegetarian Temple) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; specific performance of the agreement to sell was ordered (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
79	Re Chan Yoo Tuck: Appeal Against Bankruptcy Order Allowed 24 May 2000 Judgment Creditors (Respondent)Lost	24 May 2000	Judgment Creditors (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of the appeal fixed at $2,000; ordered to refund costs below (if paid) to the debtor; ordered to pay costs of the application below fixed at $700. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
80	Fujitsu v Singapore Airlines: Warsaw Convention & Liability for Lost Cargo 27 Apr 2000 Malaysia Airline System (Defendant)Lost	27 Apr 2000	Malaysia Airline System (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant; damages to be assessed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
81	Tacplas Property Services v Lee: Validity of Property Sale Agreement by Co-Administrator 07 Feb 2000 Lee Peter Michael (administrator of the estate of Lee Chong Miow, deceased) (Respondent)Lost	07 Feb 2000	Lee Peter Michael (administrator of the estate of Lee Chong Miow, deceased) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.