Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco

Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco is a association in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco has been represented by 1 law firm and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Bird & Bird ATMD LLP	2 cases	Sivagnanaratnam Sivananthan Loy Ming Chuen Brendan Teo Tze She Mok Ho Fai Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	120,000.00	60,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sgca-37 07 Nov 2023	07 Nov 2023	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed, with costs of $120,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by AGWI to the Consorzio. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2022-sghc-33 22 Feb 2022	22 Feb 2022	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed on the basis of section 41(1)(a) of the Geographical Indications Act (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).