Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (trading as Rabobank International, Singapore Branch)

Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (trading as Rabobank International, Singapore Branch) is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (trading as Rabobank International, Singapore Branch) has been represented by 2 law firms and 6 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (trading as Rabobank International, Singapore Branch)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.0
Complex Cases
0 (0.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost22.0 parties avg
Won12.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201112.0 parties avg
201022.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (trading as Rabobank International, Singapore Branch)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost2(66.7%)
Won1(33.3%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD0.001 cases
USD5,150,853.211 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20111
1
20102
11

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
15 Sep 2011
AppellantLostThe appeal against the decision to set aside the payment as an unfair preference was dismissed.
02 Dec 2010
AppellantWonAppeal allowed; Rabobank is entitled to US$5,150,853.21, which is the difference between the US$5,178,212.41, the sum claimed by Rabobank and the amounts rightly excluded by the Judge for being invoices not subject to the MRPA, which is US$17,359.20. Interest at the rate of 5.33 % will apply on the judgment sum from the date of the writ. Assumed USD, as the original claim was in USD.
07 Mar 2010
PlaintiffLostPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.