CPIT INVESTMENTS LTD

CPIT INVESTMENTS LTD is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 1 law firm.

Legal Representation

CPIT INVESTMENTS LTD has been represented by 1 law firm and 2 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	1 case	Tan Poh Ling Wendy Chua Han Yuan Kenneth

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of CPIT INVESTMENTS LTD's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of CPIT INVESTMENTS LTD's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2018-sgcai-4 10 Jul 2018	10 Jul 2018	Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant	LostAppeal dismissed and ordered to pay costs. CPIT to pay Qilin its costs of S$170,000 for CA 126 and CA 145, its costs of S$534,000 for the proceedings at first instance, and its disbursements of S$106,622.26 for the proceedings at first instance excluding Qilin’s claim for legal fees in relation to advice on Hong Kong law. The court also ordered CPIT to pay Qilin’s reasonable disbursements, to be taxed if not agreed, in relation to CA 126, CA 145, and Qilin’s claim for legal fees in relation to advice on Hong Kong law. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2018-sgcai-1 05 Mar 2018	05 Mar 2018	Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant	LostCPIT's appeal against the dismissal of its counterclaim was dismissed.