Dorsey James Michael
Dorsey James Michael is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Dorsey James Michael has been represented by 2 law firms and 3 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Straits Law Practice LLC | 3 cases |
George Hwang LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Dorsey James Michael's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
Won | 22.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2014 | 12.0 parties avg |
2013 | 22.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Dorsey James Michael's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Partial | 1(33.3%) |
Won | 2(66.7%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2014 | 1 1 |
2013 | 2 11 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
13 Jan 2014 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed in its entirety and reverse the Judge’s decision to order interrogatories 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1 to be answered by Dorsey. Dorsey is to have the costs of this appeal and the proceedings below on an indemnity basis. This is in accordance with the scheme for costs provided in O 26A r 5. The usual consequential orders are to follow. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
24 Apr 2013 | Appellant | WonApplication to strike out Civil Appeal dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed. |
09 Apr 2013 | Defendant | PartialThe defendant's appeal was allowed in part, and he was required to answer certain interrogatories. |