Everest VC Pte Ltd

Everest VC Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Everest VC Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	1 case	Lum Kwong Hoe Melvin Joel Raj Moosa Quahe Cheng Ann Lawrence

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Everest VC Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	210.0 parties avg	10.0	66.7%
Won	110.0 parties avg	10.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2021	210.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Everest VC Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghc-318 20 Dec 2022	20 Dec 2022	Defendant	LostThe court declined to order an inquiry as to damages, and made no order as to costs of the fifth and sixth defendants’ application for such an inquiry. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2021-sghc-91 15 Apr 2021	15 Apr 2021	Defendant	WonThe court discharged the freezing order against the sixth defendant.
3	2021-sghc-50 25 Feb 2021	25 Feb 2021	Defendant	LostThe court held that the plaintiffs are duly and properly represented by Rev Law, thus the application to discharge the injunction is denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.