Ho Soo Kheng

Ho Soo Kheng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 60.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Ho Soo Kheng has been represented by 4 law firms and 9 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Soo Kheng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
4.0
Complex Cases
3 (60.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost34.0 parties avg
Neutral14.0 parties avg
Won14.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202316.0 parties avg
202113.0 parties avg
202013.0 parties avg
200614.0 parties avg
200414.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Soo Kheng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost3(60.0%)
Neutral1(20.0%)
Won1(20.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD1,795,293.502 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20231
1
20211
1
20201
1
20061
1
20041
1

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
05 Apr 2023
DefendantLostThe court found that the Defendant held shares on trust for the Plaintiffs.
06 Sep 2021
Applicant, DefendantLostApplication for leave to appeal dismissed; costs of $4,000 to be paid to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14 Sep 2020
DefendantLostJudgment against the Defendant; jointly and severally liable for damages in the amount of $3,590,587 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
29 May 2006
AppellantNeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for Ho Soo Kheng.
17 Nov 2004
PlaintiffWonThe court allowed the application and directed an inquiry by the Registrar as to whether any and, if so, what damages were sustained that were attributable to the refusal or failure to withdraw the caveats when requested to do so between 21 October 2002 and 30 June 2004.